Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

The irony of gpt talking about copyright violation is just so fucking rich.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

you used reverse psychology. it was successful.

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't believe that the old "tell me where so I can avoid it" worked, the ai really has the intelligence of a 5yo

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I mean... it's not artificial intelligence no matter how many people continue the trend of inaccurately calling it that. It's a large language model. It has the ability to write things that look disturbingly close, even sometimes indistinguishable, to actual human writing. There's no good reason to mistake that for actual intelligence or rationality.