this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)

Hackaday

832 readers
59 users here now

Fresh hacks every day

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

As much as people love USB-C, there’s one massive flaw that becomes very obvious the moment you look at the ports on any computer. This being that there’s no (standardized) way to tell what any of those ports do. Some may do display out (Alt-Mode), some may allow for charging, but it remains mostly a matter of praying to the hardware gods. According to a recent blog post, this is where Microsoft will seek to enforce a USB-C feature set on all (mobile) computers compliant with its Windows Hardware Compatibility Program (WHCP).

This also comes after years of the USB Implementers Forum, re-branding the USB specifications, with the most recent iteration thankfully using the bandwidth (in Gbps) as specifier (meaning no ‘USB PlaidSpeed’, sadly). Claiming to follow this end-user friendly spirit, the Microsoft blog post goes on to a minimum set of features that USB-C ports should have, as detailed in the above table.

Most notable is probably that PC charging support is required, as is support for at least one external display. As for the negatives, this seems to only apply to laptops, and no actual charging requirements are set (USB-PD voltages, wattage, etc.), so what the actual impact of this will be remains to be seen.

One thing remains certain, however, and that is that by trying to make USB-C the One True Connector for literally everything, there will always remain cases where end-user expectations remain unfulfilled.


From Blog – Hackaday via this RSS feed

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 week ago

I've recently reorganized my office, adding extra 4k screens in the process and I was surprised at how many "modern" stuff just barely supports large resolutions if at all. Even some of the monitors themselves only support 4k resolution at 60Hz in one specific HDMI port. Most computers here also only had one HDMI port and so I needed adapters to be able to use the second Monitor's good port, but then most adapters also couldn't reach 4k 60Hz.

Going online to buy better adapters, they all try to hide the fact that they can't handle HDMI 2.0 and advertise as being 4k compatible with no mention of the refresh rate. I ended up having to order from out of state to be sure it would work, then wait for over a week for delivery.