this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
188 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24176 readers
3007 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is asking Secretary of State Marco Rubio for information on the Trump administration's contingency plans if billionaire Elon Musk breaches his companies' current contracts with the U.S. amid the ongoing public fall out between him and President Trump.

In a letter to Rubio as acting national security adviser and obtained by CBS News, Warren said Mr. Trump and Musk's public disagreements about the upcoming reconciliation bill that escalated into a public online spat could "have serious implications for U.S. national security."

The Massachusetts Democrat mentioned Mr. Trump's proposal to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies, which the world's richest man followed with a threat that SpaceX would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Musk has since walked back his threat.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm behind the news, musk backed out? So not just Taco but maco?

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you mean by backed out, exactly? He is no longer working with DOGE if thats what you mean

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

I think they're referring to him threatening to decommission the dragon capsule and then immediately dropping that

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good for Warren for keeping on top of this, but we need more than contingency plans. We need better laws to protect politics from corporate interests. I understand it's been this way for a long time in the US and that we won't be able to end it, but we've seen how dangerous and extreme the system can allow it to be now and it must be curtailed.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Can we crowd fund our politicians to our side for once?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, the contingency plan is going to be “Give more money to Boeing and Lockheed Martin,” and we saw how that went with Starliner.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Marco Rubio

I'm sure he'll take this very seriously, as he clearly has had the best interest of the American people in mind 🙄

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

As well-meaning as Warren is, neither she nor anyone else can do anything. We live in the new reality of fascism.