Neat. It seems like Helium-3 is one of the only materials that might make sense to ship back from the Moon, given how rare it is on Earth. Still bloody expensive, but maybe, just maybe, economically viable.
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
11 points (76.2% liked)
Space
1454 readers
156 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceβs local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
π Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
π Engineering
π Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Imagine sending a ship to the moon and it comes back lighter than it was when it left and not because it has less fuel, but because it has a lot of cargo.
The best business model is tricking venture capitalists into thinking there's a business model
Stay the fuck off my moon.