this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
237 points (98.4% liked)

Buy European

10490 readers
43 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

An open letter from the Document Foundation warns that Euro-Office, which is being โ€œmarketedโ€ as the first open-source office suite developed in Europe, isn't what it seems - and may reinforce Microsoftโ€™s closed source technology instead.

... Microsoft ... developed and controls the horrible proprietary OOXML format, designed precisely to prevent Digital Sovereignty by maintaining content lock-in. It is far less understandable on the part of companies that claim to advocate open source, such as those promoting Euro-Office.

Euro-Office defaults to the fully proprietary OOXML document format, developed and controlled solely by Microsoft. This makes it a de facto ally of Microsoft in its content lock-in strategy, with control remaining firmly in Redmond and far from Europe.

So, despite what is being written in support of Euro-Office โ€” the latest of the office suites developed in Europe, and not the first โ€” the announcement is not against Microsoft. On the contrary, it strengthens Microsoftโ€™s strategy against European Digital Sovereignty, or, if you prefer, against the freedom of European users to control and manage their own content.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Brummbaer@pawb.social 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out MS is behind Euro-Office.

[โ€“] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Oh come off it.

[โ€“] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Uhh, it's a fork of OnlyOffice.

Also, it supports open formats like ODS. All they have to do is change the default.

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really dislike those opportunistic bootlicker like euro office and euro os.

[โ€“] semperpeppe@feddit.it 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not familiar with EuroOS. What is it?

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

I meant EU OS. A "proof of concept" Linux distribution but instead on relying on already existing European based Linux Distributions (arch, opensuse, cachyos) it's using fedora which is backed by Red Hat.

But hey it looks fancy with the European flag replaced the stars of the founding nations with windows cursors.

[โ€“] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Euro-Office could always pull a reverse-enshittification by offering full compatibility for the OOXML format and defaulting to it initially, then once the software has a loyal userbase, publish tools making it simple to convert existing documents to open formats as well as arguing for doing so. It would be a fight with Microsoft but they have to start somewhere realistic, and the world still uses Microsoft.

[โ€“] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that tool be called "Save As..."? If the suite supports both formats, converting a document is as simple as opening and saving it.

And they could absolutely just default to OpenDocument and also support OOXML, just like LibreOffice does.

[โ€“] bufalo1973@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

An initial screen with a select default option.

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 19 points 2 weeks ago

You really believe in the good of man eh?

[โ€“] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They already support open formats. All they have to do is change the default.

[โ€“] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not a great decision, but a practical one. As long as it has great support for both, the default can be changed later once it has traction.

[โ€“] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But why not have it default ODF?

[โ€“] falseprophet@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because not ever organization and company that has to work with documents produced with Euro-office uses an open source office suite and Microsoft support for ODF is terrible. Which will result company to push for Europe to return to Microsoft.

We must first make sure everyone switches to software that is capable of reading ODF files before switching to that format.

[โ€“] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

This reminds me of how Microsoft killed Java applets in the browser by โ€œsupportingโ€ them in Internet explorer.

[โ€“] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I suppose that makes sense. Either way though workers will have to be trained to understand the difference between the two formats and when it's appropriate to use each. Seems like ODF will be more likely to get adopted if it's the default, with a reminder built in to use OOXML if sharing with someone outside the organization (obviously in more user-friendly language).

[โ€“] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell me youโ€™ve not migrated an org of 25000 50-year old public servants without telling youโ€™ve not migrated an org of 25000 50-year old public servants.

[โ€“] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

No one has done that because no single person can do that by themselves.

I've participated in technical migrations of large organizations full of non-technical, unmotivated users. It sucks regardless.

And we can't just keep lowering our expectations re: people interacting with technology. Desktop computers, office suites, and file formats are concepts that came into the non-techie consciousness 20 years ago now. The people who refuse to use an extra 5 brain cells to try to understand this stuff should not be the baseline we cater to.

[โ€“] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Microsoft - The Genocide Computing Company!

[โ€“] Trebuchet 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Genuine question, if somebody could help me out, I'd appreciate it. How does using OOXML restrict what a user can do with their own content? Or have have I missed the point here?

[โ€“] Serinus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a standard that Microsoft controls. They can use it in an embrace, extend, extinguish strategy in the future, and Euro-Office is doing the embrace part for them.

Compatibility is important. So is defaulting to an open standard. That default safe option is critical.

[โ€“] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The ISO format is defined. Microsoft may choose to move beyond it (in fact I think they already have) and Europe, provided theyโ€™ve deployed software that doesnโ€™t automatically follow along with this move, will fork and be left with their version. Leverage works both ways.