this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
1939 points (99.2% liked)

Uplifting News

19296 readers
108 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 291 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Better put their own wall up before the Americans start pouring in.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 149 points 2 weeks ago

"I told you Mexico would pay for it!"

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I was literally just thinking retiring to Mexico doesn't sound terrible in the future.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Climate change is not boding well for Mexico unfortunately. You can expect severe water shortages in the coming decades.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 243 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

not free; tax funded

Which is great! Taxes should be invested in citizens’ needs.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 150 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Free as in "free at the point of service".
Of course it is paid for somehow.
But as far a a someone going into a hospital to get a cast, medicine, birth... It's free

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That’s true. Unfortunately, calling it free is often used by people who want to paint it as infeasible, and is used as an excuse to cut funding—even when data shows it’s an investment with human and monetary rewards.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Conservative America is driven so hard by the fear of somebody poorer than you getting something you're not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As far as everyone except oligarchs are concerned, it means everyone can access it without getting financially fucked over into debt. And that's excellent news.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

incorrect slightly- while most boomer and right wing assholes know it means free at point of service and tax funded they act like it means “free for welfare queens and illegals” because they think daddy capitalist is watching them lick boots.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 119 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Luckily the US built a border wall so Mexico won't be overflooded with illegal immigrants trying to profit the free health care.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

too late. migration started years ago. as long as the gringos bring money.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How will this impact the medical tourism industry that Americans depend on for affordable healthcare?

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You're not kidding. Some towns like Los Algodones built their entire economy around medical tourism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure it will persist, as it primarily services Americans. And their money is still good.

If anything, we'll see the Mexican health care system expand in order to absorb all the domestic residents who can now afford the same care

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm sure you need to be a Mexican citizen to qualify for the program, I imagine foreigners get a bill. But I'm an American that expects a crippling bill from medical care so I have a bias.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

In some countries they don't even have the financial infrastructure to bill patients, so injured tourists get free health care. A big chunk of American medical bills is due to the cost of billing.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

It'll probably stay the same. This administration is very aware of these issues and I doubt they'll intervene. Private practice is already available to anyone who wants it, no questions asked.

Source: am Mexican living in Mexico

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who's the shithole country now, America? 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Wunz@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago
[–] eltacopeludo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 weeks ago (25 children)

Mexican here. They are saying everything is free now, but there are not enough medicines, doctors or hospitals so is just a shallow gesture.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a step. Vs. medicines too expensive to buy, and doctors that you can't see for months who run you through the mill to get their numbers up. I can't say which is worse when the result is about the same. At least you have more of a chance now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

No country has enough medicine, doctors, or hospitals.

[–] Talentlesssculptor@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Mexico has around 25 Doctors per 100000 capita. That is lower than almost all European countries that averaged 40 Doctors per 100000 capita.

When it comes to nurses, the comparison is worse. 29/100000capita in Mexico and over 100/100000capita in Norway, Finland, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Ireland, Switzerland, Belgium and the Netherlands. With no EU nation falling below 40/100000capita.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/doctors-per-capita-by-country

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This stands out even more because we're in an era when even countries with Universal Healthcare have been walking back on it (as well as Social Security, Unions and other earlier Leftwing conquests) by privatizing them piecemeal through things like forced outsourcing of some services and public-private initiatives.

[–] Aragaren@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's important to note is that these placed aren't going back on it because it doesn't work. They are going back on it because of back room deals made with corporate insurance lobbyists and their bought politicians. Profit is always the driving force for privatization.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Exactly.

You can just look at the experience of creating the National Health Service in the UK (there's a bunch of documentaries floating around) to see how it's an overall positive for Society by a large margin, not just directly but also indirectly because for example when people can go see a doctor for free they are far more likely to end up being treated for sickness early on (which its cheaper and easier) or to get treatment for debilitating but not life threatening conditions which in turn even gets reflected in higher Economic outcomes because healthier people are more productive.

Universal Healthcare Systems only "don't work" for those who are fatcats getting a slice of that sweet sweet 13%+ of national GDP (about 18% in the US) that goes into Healthcare in the average country.

[–] JC1@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Yes it's what's happening here in Canada and it's sickening. But it looks like it's better to blame the left for no reason, so why vote for them? Better keep slowly dismantling everything we collectively built instead!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I voted her for this kind of policies, but reality is not that simple. Public healthcare costs a lot of money, and current facilities and personnel are in the stone age. I wouldn't go to any public healthcare facility right now as my first choice. At least not where I live. Sustained investment and vigilance are key, and I hope that by the end of her mandate we will have something we could call a proper public healthcare system, not yet a decent one, but an existing one.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Public healthcare costs a lot of money

True. But private healthcare costs even more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A step in the right direction. Thank you for sharing the realism on a clickbait title.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 5inister@reddthat.com 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Healthcare in Mexico has been free and public for decades. There are still paid private practices and having social security limits the public providers you can use but Article 77 Bis-1 of the General Health Law states that anyone without social security can be treated for free. That article was first published in 2002 and last modified in 2023. This is just the administration claiming that they enacted (excellent) old laws.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was free for workers and a few administrations ago they implemented a free for all program that was mostly cancelled. They system was also divided by private workers and government workers with different quality of services , this tries to implement all services into one, hopefully it works but this administration has not been very good at the implementation phase of any project

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you'd told any American 40 years ago that Mexico's democracy in 2026 would make Americas look pathetic, they'd have called you crazy and then beaten you up. Not so much anymore.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They'd probably still beat you up. And then shoot you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Congratulations Mexico! It’s nice to read a positive article for once. Happy for everyone this allows a pathway to getting the healthcare treatment they deserve.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Ah, so that's why the US is getting more aggressive towards Mexico. Can't have universal healthcare so close to the border.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Americans are already going there for cheaper health care. My dentist recommended some expensive work, and when I told him it cost too much, HE suggested I go to Mexico, and get it done for a third the cost.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fuck. I really should have taken Spanish seriously back in High School after all

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It isn't too late to finish learning Spanish :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago

Now they are going to need a wall to keep american's out.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So, it is that easy. Crazy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›