this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
179 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30111 readers
2312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

While I fully disagree with the entire project, any White House construction should be fully funded by the public. It’s the People’s House and inviting private money is inviting corruption.

And now he’s cancelling unemployment insurance

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 51 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And then the other half, too, of course.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 29 points 12 hours ago

And that's not even factoring in the $300 million Trump's just going to pocket. So lets just call it an even $900 million.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

THIS isn't Waste! UNEMPLOYMENT is!

-Republicans on Unemployment!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

But don't you understand, they are actually down on their luck, and everyone else is a free loader!

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's gone up in price again?

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

Shut it and cough up your 60% of a 900 million dollar ballroom, citizen.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 21 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Well, at that price we the people have the right to burn it down

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

With him in it? Please?

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Invite Canada. We accelerate at burning down your capital.

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Do it or shut up about it

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Where do they think money the government spends comes from?

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Taxes, taxes again (through tariffs), bonds (being sold at ever increasing yield rates), and printing probably. Inflation's gonna hurt so much more soon.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I wonder what atrocity they want to hide under this ballroom

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 8 points 11 hours ago