this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
309 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7483 readers
604 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Great timing and phrasing. "Be slow about slop development ooor.. Burn everyone and everything!"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 13 points 6 days ago

Lol easy choice

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly "inevitable" changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.

  • loss of employment? Check.
  • profound change to living conditions? Check.
  • loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
  • threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
  • increasing likelihood of war? Check.
  • threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
  • threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
  • Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.

It's as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the "accusation in a mirror" pattern.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago

So no AI then, eh! Eh?

[–] ennof@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah we can have a global climate disaster without AI too dudes. We have options [jazz hands emoji dot png]

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I want newer, cleaner, superior technology made with the help of AI to lessen, stop or even reverse Climate Change.

Also my Room is to damn hot! XD

[–] dr_robotBones@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How is a token predictor that can only regurgitate old ideas going to invent something new?

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 0 points 5 days ago

I asked ai to refute this argument, but if you say these false things today, more than 4 year after the chatgpt moment then im probably wasting our time anyway.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Clear answer for me - everything else wins over pointless "AI"

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Making collages out of human excrement wins over pointless "AI" for me.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, especially if it's smeared on his face

Is... Is there a line or what

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Well, thought more of the better stuff like nature, not Musk's brainfarts

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything that makes rich people look stupid and blow money is good, yes.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you're proAI or what? 😉

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

...

...

...

Shit. You got me with that.

But I'm more pro-OceanGate.

I'm pretty sure "squish" is the exact opposite of "blow"

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Does not and will never exist, so it isn't "something" .

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Right? Talk about not being able to read the room.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Hmmmmm lower electric bills for our countries electorate OR giant buildings they hate that pollute their water, give them ill health from noise pollution, and take their jobs?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn I don't know, let me ask chatgpt.

They said they'd love me more if I syntax error input new token so that's what I live by

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago

I mean, we must choose. Just not in favor of slopcenters burning through resources for highly dubious advantages.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 25 points 1 week ago

I'd pay good money to rid the world of AI

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not true at all. AI can and should be running on renewables alone.

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago

Yes, Euria and many others in Europa are already doing it.

https://euria.infomaniak.com/

The Problem is not AI but how Datacenters are used in USA.

And closed-loop cooling. But then it will still emit heat, which should be captured in a downstream process.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

I mean that's an easy choice, but also no fucking way. Rich pricks would pay for data centers even if they had to run them exclusively off renewables. This is a bluff.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

Cool, fuck off then.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

politico

ewww

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

They just say it. 🫴

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No we don't. I'm pretty sure we'll be able to miss all the climate goals even if we ban data centres.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most probably. But not by such a high margin. The energy consumption of datacenters is completely insane.

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

Its not completely Insane for Datacenters or Supercomputers in Europa. Also our Supercomputers are always first in Green500, unlike USAs!

I just wish we could convince tptb into building that much grid capacity in renewables. For the citizenry. Not for buisness.

I mean I'm aware of a few projects, but like nothing on datacenter scale

load more comments
view more: next ›