this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46574 readers
1060 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just opened vitamines, it's only filled about a fifth. No reason to do so, but it does take up a lot more space. That means: more boxes for storage, more trucks for transport and of course more plastic used. Just... why?

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SPRUNTnsfw@fedinsfw.app 37 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The basic answer is that the production lines are already set up for that size. Some number cruncher figured out they would save $0.01+ by not taking the time to switch the production lines from one to another and, instead, just switching the labels.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and, instead, just switching the labels

The labels may also be part of it. Vitamins need a lot of mandatory nutritional information printed on them, and they may simply have been unable to print all of that (in a reasonable font size) on a smaller bottle.


But, of course, the real unspoken reason is that it's deceptive marketing. People who don't read the label carefully will see a bigger bottle and think that it means they're getting more product inside, even if a competing brand's smaller bottle actually contains more.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago

i don't think labelling is the reason because plenty of medicine packaging just has fold-outs with information on it. It's actually something i find really neat.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except they are paying to ship 50% air. Those calculations were probably made before gas prices went up.

[–] vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe, but even with more expensive plastic and shipping, it's still small and lightweight.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

That actually makes a lot of sense. I always wondered why all my prescription bottles were so much larger than they needed to be.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

My brother hates the pharmacy I use because they to often seem to be out of smaller containers and put things in ones way larger than needed for the prescription.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I bought the bottle of 360 pills at Walmart a couple years ago. Finally ran out and got more. Same brand. Same price.

Suddenly there’s only 200 pills in the bottle AND it’s in a larger bottle now? wtf?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Same brand. Same price. Suddenly there’s only 200 pills in the bottle AND it’s in a larger bottle now?

AKA Shrinkflation. Retail is full of it, and it is usually done in a way that leaves the original package size alone. The goal is to reduce the amount of product inside of the package, without changing the package noticeably. The linked Wiki page uses Toblerone as an example, but here is another good example:

The package dimensions for the peanut butter appear to stay the same, (at least when it is sitting on a shelf) so customers don’t immediately notice the smaller size. They just think “my last jar was this same size, so I’m getting the same amount.” It feels like the same amount, even though it is much less for the same price.

My personal favorite example is the Terry’s Chocolate Orange, which slightly reduced the thickness of each individual wedge. By adding that air gap between wedges, they were able to reduce the amount of chocolate in each orange by like 15%, while still maintaining the overall size and shape. Here is the old vs the new:

Notice how thin the new slices are? That means less chocolate per wedge, for the same price.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They must use the same bottle for a 400-pill bottle and a 200-pill bottle.

[–] NepGinger@lemy.nl 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are the pills the same size?

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] NepGinger@lemy.nl 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's even weirder - I know it's all marketing, but how do they not take into account that there are people that can compare them?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The average person wouldn’t demonstrably care. Same thing with shrinkflation. Also, depending on where you live, the average IQ and general knowledge thresholds people meet are lower than you think. We’re all living with the consequences of Gen X and older millennials that were brought up with lead gasoline and poor schooling.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They could have made the pills larger, to fill up the bottle. Then you wouldn't even guess there was something to complain about.

Bottles are made in standard sizes by the millions, they used whatever worked for this product, base on what others here have said.

Pills are mostly filler anyway, just to make them big enough to handle, and also to improve dosing per pill. The active ingredient is usually a very small part of the volume.

I guarantee, if it were cheaper, all things considered, to use a smaller bottle, they would have.

[–] NepGinger@lemy.nl 1 points 5 days ago

I see your point and would agree, but they have different containers. The bigger pills are mostly filler, so it would be cheaper if they made those smaller.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Bigger packaging takes up more space on the shelf, and you can print more branding on it.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The most obvious answer is shrinkflation. They may have sold units with more pills in them before but economic pressures put them in a pickle: increase price for all or keep price the same and reduce content. It's possible they had ordered a gazillion of these pill bottles and have them in storage now. They gotta use them. It would be economically and environmentally mad if they put a million of these bottles in a landfill and ordered smaller replacements.

[–] NepGinger@lemy.nl 1 points 5 days ago

The brand only started about 6 months ago so probably not.

[–] lenocolomo@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Was it an Amazon owned company?

[–] NepGinger@lemy.nl 1 points 4 days ago

It's a Dutch Multinational.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Weird kinder surprise

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 5 days ago