this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
343 points (99.4% liked)

News

28483 readers
4372 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK (AP) — Sending children back to school in new sneakers, jeans and T-shirts is likely to cost U.S. families significantly more this fall if the bespoke tariffs President Donald Trump put on leading exporters take effect as planned, American industry groups warn.

About 97% of the clothes and shoes purchased in the U.S. are imported, predominantly from Asia, the American Apparel & Footwear Association said, citing its most recent data. Walmart, Gap Inc., Lululemon and Nike are a few of the companies that have a majority of their clothing made in Asian countries.

Those same garment-making hubs took a big hit under the president’s plan to punish individual countries for trade imbalances. For all Chinese goods, that meant tariffs of at least 54%. He set the import tax rates for Vietnam and neighboring Cambodia at 46% and 49%, and products from Bangladesh and Indonesia at 37% and 32%.

Working with foreign factories has kept labor costs down for U.S. companies in the fashion trade, but neither they nor their overseas suppliers are likely to absorb new costs that high. India, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka also got slapped with high tariffs so aren’t immediate sourcing alternatives.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least during the Great Depression, you could make clothes from feed sacks. We don't even have that this time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We have a superabundance of clothes. People have enormous closets full of lightly worn clothing. We build entire second and third iteration storefronts for outlets and second hand clothing. We have so much extra clothing that we regularly give it away for free.

Of all the things to worry about the US running short on, cloths shouldn't be anywhere near the top of the list.

People who lack clothing aren't short on cheap clothing, they're short on homes to keep their seasonal wear.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Yep. Anyone see all the clothes and shoes floating around in the sea from the secondary market in that movie "Buy Now"?

I went to a thrift store recently and the amount of clothes there that looked nearly-new....it was crazy. Went to an army surplus store today and the used stuff was pretty well constructed and priced fairly well. Some of the new stuff they had was kind of on the high end, but didn't seem to be hit by tariffs yet.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of it is fast fashion made from inferior material in a haphazard manner.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Which is worse when you consider how many microplastic particles are entering the water through clothes washing alone…

Yeah there's not really a need for new clothes for most people. Unless you are me and you have a shit tonne of clothes from middle school and highschool that are theoretically wearable but I should really just fucken donate.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why do we keep picking random things to point out that tariffs will effect their price. The tariffs will effect almost everything's price. Even if things are made in America, very few things are made with 100% American resources, meaning at least some materials, parts, and assembly will be done outside the US and be subject to Tariffs. And even if the thing is 100% American made, when all the competition has to raise prices, guess what they will do too. Nearly nothing will be unaffected by tariffs.

It seems basically equivalent to inflation which we're quite familiar with because we just went through a huge bump in inflation. The scary thing about that is that I noticed while many people's jobs started to make at least some competitive adjustments in pay for inflation, others did not. I worry that those of us that didn't see any income adjustment in the previous round will feel this next wave even harder.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's why I bought all the canned goods and clothes I could from costco this week. It's the last of good prices, and they weren't even that good.

Low quality fast fashion clothes are a perfect example Of what would be GOOD to put tariffs on.we need to discourage them.

Steel, computer chips, major resources that are only obtainable from other countries and will have chain reactions in supply chains is what's going to cause all of the causes.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess this is as good a time and place as any to plug this site:

https://freesewing.org/

[–] belastend@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

God i read that as a german trying to spell "free the wing"

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to buy Noke sneakers, iPones and McDonal's then.

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I already shop at the Gape

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Joke's on you, I haven't bought new clothes since 2020

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Im assuming that's BC. And you're immortal.

(Edit: aww he corrected the date error. Booo)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’m totally not a time traveler.

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How was Hawkins’s party?

The version I went to didn't have nearly enough spiced rum. I guess I didn't get my order in late/early enough

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Precisely the kind of thing a time traveler trying to keep time travel a secret would say.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah they don't really prepare you for this in training

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weird. They prepared me, but then again that was ages from now.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They've always/never had a problem with retro-updating internal documentation.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Well obviously. That would be ridiculous.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

I don't think I can even buy US made workwear anymore. I used to buy Carhartt but then they went overseas and started using different fabric for the duck pants so I buy Dickies now because they are made in Mexico and are just as good, IMO.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Help US make goods they import even more expensive by adding an export tax.

With foreign countries apply export tax to all export to US, local manufacturer in US will increase their prices to match the now overpriced imports from overseas, because why not.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And lower US wages to lower their manufacturing costs, to lower prices so that US people can afford the same shit again. Oh wait...

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is, this is the one industry I don't mind the tariffs for, really.

Firstly, the loss of plentiful textile jobs in America has reduced our potential labor pool significantly. Second, the labor standards in these nations are often well below what I'd call acceptable; and the only way to change that is to sharply reduce what we import from them and try to get some level of ethics involved.

Maybe a saner politician, after the midterms in 2026, will be able to use this to push regulations on US companies to ensure that all labor done for goods imported to the US is maintained at US wages and levels of safety and worker protection equal to our onshore workers. Instead of blanketing the nation with a tariff, make the companies responsible for the welfare of their employees (and the ethics of any material produced in their name). Plus, if they're forced to show that they've paid US-equivalent wages to every foreign employee, they'll be more inclined to move the labor on-shore, since the transportation costs will start to hurt. Of course, the current crop of corpocrats won't do that, but maybe someone will.

There's a lot of things where small, well calculated and negotiated tariffs raised up over time and with advance notice and investment, would be beneficial to the economy, human rights, and the environment.

Blanket tariffs are always bad and this clown doesn't know squat.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

So it's going to be even harder to have my collection of

BALENCIAGA Super Destroyed Wide-Leg Jeans

And pay rent to my awful landlord?

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

What’s see what happens to the words “no” and “shit” and put them together in a simple phrase.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I'm actually good with not buying things made from child labour. I just bought some altras, I forgot to check where the shoes are made in but I believe the company is australian and goodonyou.eco said they're an ok company

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We should only wear clothes during work hours on special occasions. What's with all this conservative clothing-isms!

That is the literal point of tariffs. It is why they exist. It is their raison d’etre it f you speak metric.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

So they end up either paying more from tariffs or paying more from wages being higher because the things are made in the US instead of Asia. The only way all that shit doesn't lead to a ton of inflation is by giving the same wage as in Asia to people in the USA and then it's the real estate market that will crash instead.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

We have a global market place. Only an idiot would place blanket tariffs on products.

[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's almost as if actions have consequences

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Not just what we wear....