"siding with a group of Democratic state attorneys general"
Maybe I should be keeping a list of "actually many Democrats are doing stuff"
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
362 points (98.4% liked)
News
30166 readers
4029 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
When people support this or the trialess deportation of people who can't prove their citizenship on the spot, ask them to prove their citizenship to you right then and there.
Most people can't quickly produce proof of citizenship.
And if they do, say it's fake, confiscate it and arrest them anyway.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-citizen-real-id-detained-210643526.html
And even if one of them decides it's real (after giving you a good beating):
They realized he did, in fact, have his green card, but questioned whether it was real.
"'I don't know, maybe it's fake' … The other guy says, 'No, it's real' … That's when they finally stopped"
They'll threaten to do what they can to get it revoked just so they can come back for you:
"Do you think you're a big shot just because you have a green card? I'll make sure they revoke that green card of yours," Reyes said, recalling what agents told him. "'I'm going to do everything I can to get this paper revoked,' an immigration officer told me."
In Nazi germany “let me see your papers” was very much a thing
If their proof of citizenship is their ID, remind them that people make their entire living off selling fake or altered ID cards.
Sorry, your drivers license isn't good enough, you're going to the concentration camps.
And remember even RealID licenses aren't proof of citizenship.
Exactly. Sure I have a passport. But I'm not carrying that thing around with me.
But I'm white. So currently, it's probably OK for me, but time and this admin will be coming for us all.
Judge is not suppose to "side with democrats", or any group or ideology. They're supposed to only side with the constitution and the written and agreed upon laws.
The author of the article wrote it that way. That's how headlines work.
Which is exactly what this judge did. It just happened to mean they chose the side the Democrat AGs over that of the fascist taco
I'm very happy that the courts keep citing with democracy