Lawsuit filed by dozens of employees says people who took maternity or disability leave were disproportionately selected for layoffs

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

"Look, if I'd laid him off because he took sick leave, that would be illegal, but I didn't lay him off because he took sick leave, I laid him off because AI told me to lay him off. And AI is smart. You can't tell me it wasn't a good decision."

Repeat across the entire economy

"We don't need AI to be functional - we just need it to give us answers we want and convince enough people that it's giving those answers because it's better than us."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 months ago

    “The AI models learn from watching really smart people do things,” Zuckerberg said in an internal meeting, according to the Information. “The average intelligence of the people who are at this company is significantly higher than the average set of people that you can get to do tasks.”

    This guy doesn't understand anything about humans doing tasks, or generative AI.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Why would they even need AI for that?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That's the thing with AI. It's being used where it doesn't need to be used so corporate execs can justify investment in it to shareholders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Because they use corporate HR software. Try use Workday or similar crap and you will know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It's funny you mentioned that...we just switched to Workday at my job about a month ago. So far, nothing works properly. Everyone's hours have all been wrong, and no one can figure out why the system keeps fucking things up. It's actually pretty hilarious. You feed it simple, basic data...and it spits out garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Feels like a simple data query would have sufficed, but ok

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Hiring people who know how to do that is expensive. Hiring incompetent executives who know how to ask an AI is more expensive (but it benefits said executives, so they prefer this option).

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 3 months ago
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    So desperate to justify the unnecessary amount of money thrown away.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    This is all I need to know.

    1000012498

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I feel like you could just use SQL for that.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Then your compensation does not include said leave. The options are to work every day indefinitely or get fired for not showing up. Pretty sure that didn't come up during the job interviews.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago