Does anyone here actually support Google's Developer Verification?

I don’t. I’ve put a warning about it in my repo because I’m against policies like sideloading restrictions, forced ID verification.

Curious what other devs here think. Is Play Store still worth the hassle?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 3 months ago

I think if Google (or Apple for that matter) wants to play this game, then everyone from the reviewer to the CEO should be held legally responsible when malware ends up not only verified but distributed by them. And by legally I mean also as accessory to the crime.

  • source
  • [–] 93 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Continue publishing app freely, do not verify yourself

    Fuck google

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    I have getgoogleoff.me email domain 👍🏼

    edit: from disroot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I paid the fee for a dev account near the beginning of Android. Haven't had any apps published in over a decade, but from what I understand my account is grandfathered in so I don't have to jump through as many hoops to get something published if I chose to, compared to newer accounts. Anyhow, since I have an account I suppose I'm unaffected by this decision. Still, it goes against the original spirit of Android as a free and developer-centric platform and I condemn it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago*

    Is Android Studio forcing you to register?

    Does anyone here actually support Google's Developer Verification?

    At best some are indifferent but I've never heard of anyone who actively supports this.

    Is Play Store still worth the hassle i?

    Never has been 🔫

  • source
  • [+] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    If I were a mobile dev I'd make GTK apps for Linux phones and use Pixiewood to create Android builds:

    https://github.com/sp1ritCS/gtk-android-builder

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Does that mean this app won't be available on app store, but can be installed from other places? I know there are on going changes regarding this topic, but I'm not fully informed. And researching will bring probably ton of Ai generated articles I'm not willing to look into. Could F-Droid still be used on a "regular" Android?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    What it means can be read, for example, in Detail here: https://keepandroidopen.org/en/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Holy mother of duck! This is worse than I thought. I assume custom firmware like LineageOS or e/OS don't have these restrictions. But most people have stock Android off course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    This rules are part of and enforced by the google play framework, so I would assume that as soon as Google Play and/or Google Play Services are installed on Lineage or other custom roms that then the same limitations come in effect. This is only an assuption by me, based on how I understand it, so I may be, and I hope that I am, very wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    There is an alternative service called microG, an Open Source alternative to Google libraries to replace Google Play Services in example. This makes it possible to use the Play Store without Googles proprietary stuff. However I don't know how compatible it is, but it is big part of alternative custom roms to replace Google as much as possible. I don't use the Play Store, so cannot say first hand how good it works. More info on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroG .

    Maybe this new policy and stuff could affect this alternative implementation of Google Services?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    They've been continually removing things from that and making actual Google stuff more required. To be fair, they had a good reason because it let them get around the carriers never updating anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    No it means you won't be allowed to install the app on any certified devices at all. Regardless of where it's obtained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›