this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

politics

24230 readers
3020 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 58 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

While the contempt language is gone in the Senate bill, there is new and arguably more problematic language in its place. This bill would require that anyone seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction against the federal government first post a bond that covers the costs and damages that would be sustained to the federal government, in the event it loses the case. We’re talking millions if not billions of dollars being required upfront, effectively shutting off people’s ability to sue the Trump administration.

The Senate GOP is managing optics and that's all - the effect of this provision is the same. The bond requirement would make it effectively impossible to even seek to enjoin a clearly unconstitutional executive order before a full litigation and trial.

Superficially, they could proceed through the case without, but it would mean Trump can executive order whatever he wants and it would be years before the court would even issue an order to stop him. His powers would effectively be unchecked.

It's also blatantly undemocratic and unconstitutional because it would limit the ability to seek redress for anyone who wasn't a multi-millionaire or billionaire.

And if you need any other evidence they don't want you to pay attention to this and it's the real ball game: oh look, it's Friday night.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Hopefully a court strikes even this law down.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I genuinely wish there was a way to filter all "news" about that orange shitsquirt that wasn't explicitly about his sudden and irrevocable demise. 🤷🏼‍♂️ This watching the needle twitch & do nothing is beyond pointless — it keeps his pustulant meatsac in the spotlight, benefiting no one but himself. (I wonder if his Luigi'll have the same name. That'd be crazy.)

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The GOP wants us to ignore these little details.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

We'll never forget Luigi. The only Bros. brother worth a goodgawdamn.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Who do you think will go first? Grassley or Dump?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Grassley. As dementiated as Trump is, Grassley is 3 steps ahead of him. It's fucking disgusting that skeletor is allowed to be a major Iowa representative. I'm surrounded by racist, bigoted sycophants, and it's killing me slowly everyday.

I hope it's Trump first, but I'll be chugging water the moment I see the headline for Grassley so I can go piss on his grave with all I can muster.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

¿Por que no los dos? 😅

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

NGL, I wouldn't bat an eye if a story ran involving a firing squad & the whole lot of 'em, but smart money's on civilians being up against the wall first before any of them get their turn. 🥲🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Given how things are going, I'm worried about this weekend.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not in LA, personally, so I'm less "worried about this weekend" and more "dreading the next step they'll blithely take in grinding our nation into kibble for Russia & China to feed on", more or less.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My worry is existentially, as I am also not in LA

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

I hear ya there, for sure. 🤞🏼