this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
70 points (94.9% liked)

Fuck AI

8028 readers
1318 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross posted from https://sh.itjust.works/post/64317237

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?__goaway_challenge=js-refresh&__goaway_id=5952abb63408a0fd1abde0439115ee34&__goaway_referer=https%3A%2F%2Finv.nadeko.net%2F&t=3&v=fOoWKNOXcBs

Sam Altman claimed we're already living through the singularity. Is it true, or is it just marketing? Just days before, one of OpenAI's models escaped from a testing environment and ended up hacking another company's servers on its own. We analyze how real that claim is and what the experts say.

And from there, we jump to something bigger: can artificial intelligence have a soul? We delve into the debate that has divided physicists, neuroscientists, and philosophers, from Roger Penrose's quantum theory to the arguments of Sean Carroll and Max Tegmark, including integrated information theory and the thermodynamics of life. Spoiler alert: even physics can't agree.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 76 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And the need to Rev up the hype to maximize profit off the bubble.

Edit: while ops link is not it, it seems to be a statement by him with various sources pointing to him. Anyhow, I'm not linking anything to that false prophet, ops link is sufficient.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He needs to delay his company from popping the bubble for as long as possible

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

iirc alot of the first loans start coming due in... september?

if rates arent cut by then (allowing them to refiance) they'll have to start pulling some actual revenue out of their ass to pay these loans back...which aint happening...or the chirade officially drops.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 28 points 3 weeks ago
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 21 points 3 weeks ago

AI may be smarter than Sam Altman but that's no singularity.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Sam Altman says a lot of things.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Can we all chip in to pay an etsy witch to curse him?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Can we pay roko to eat him?

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Gray Goo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_goo

By feeding the LLM output back into the LLM and destroying the source material, they are creating a singularity.

The problem is that it is a heat-death-of-the-universe-type singularity.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

How delightful. Now I can add yet another thing to my ever-growing list of things to be concerned about.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't understand the link between your comment and gray goo, other than technology potentially destroying society.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, no scenario though where I'd see that coming out of llm. It's way out of that capacity.

What we can achieve though is drying up land, creating famine and misery and the crash of society.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The LLMs are committing ecophalogy of knowledge. Their nonsensical output is being fed back into them like an ouroboros, resulting in more nonsensical output.

Humans have been performing ecophagy since hunter-gatherer times, and the rate has increased exponentially since the Industrial Revolutions, but always to the benefit of Humans and humanity.

Now the general-purpose LLMs are being destructively fed all of human knowledge and the data centres are being destructively fed all of our natural resources; not for the benefit of Humans or humanity, but for hubris and apathy.

Diversity of thought is being homogenised as more people use LLMs for mundane tasks that would be quicker, easier and more efficient to do ourselves.

Our own Gray Matter is turning into Gray Goo.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The last sentence would've sufficed, thatwe can absolutely agree on.

It's not that there will be ai nanobots rising from llm developing into that, though. Or bots. Or continually self replicating anything.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Use your imagination. It's an analogy.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a technician and Autist. I don't do wild speculation. I do derive future prospects from technical or physical facts.

And if there's not a major thing added, it will not happen.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What is the "it" that will not happen?

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

An llm can and will not have an own conscience or motivation or even possibility of acting of its own.

It can only act triggered and the rest looks like it would be so, but its only parroting.

Downvotes or not, it is factually missing parts to get there.

Its like saying the currently most advanced self driving car is possible to develop into knight riders kitt. It's not biology. It needs the components to be able to.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is about the consequences of recursively training AI on AI-generated content. It doesn't have anything to do with volition or true intelligence. There's a good article about it here.

This is the AI Grey Goo scenario: an internet choked with low-quality content, which never improves, where it is almost impossible to locate public reliable sources for information because the tools we have been able to rely on in the past – Google, social media – can never keep up with the scale of new content being created. Where the volume of content created overwhelms human or algorithmic abilities to sift through it quickly and find high-quality stuff.

The social and political consequences of this are huge. We have grown so used to information abundance, the greatest gift of the internet, that having that disrupted would be a major upheaval for the whole of society.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Now I am beginning to understand the layer you are talking about. It wasn't clear to me so far.

But you seem intelligent, may I introduce you to the double empathy problem? It's why you've (or possibly others) downvoted me, I just want to point out, since we didn't understand each other right.

Communication is hard and maybe this will go a small bit in some random future communication.

I still define all this as 'regular' man made issues. And yes they're true and really bad, and insanely, large groups are falling for it. But from a technological standpoint I do have a very different understanding of it (not better or worse, different). It's not a threat evolved by AI. It's just us.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Statistical guessing machine guessed its way into a network. That’s not a singularity. It’s just more complex than a script.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He just can't stop lying and bullshitting, can he?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Not as long as the media keeps reporting on it.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

not when the stock price going up depends on him doin the opposite

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What stock price? They aren't a public company.

When the VC money stops, OpenAI dies. Full stop.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, when the next seed round depends on him lying, him telling the truth is the wrong choice to make in his mind

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We are not facing skynet, but the techbros, media and government all want us to think so.

They did not “escape”, they were able to find security holes in pootly protected environments that they had access to. They performed the same security tests against live sites online, which also had security flaws. They did not spread, or escape, nor are they hiding on servers anywhere like in the movies. They simply performed a remote exploit after using a local one to get internet access.

These things are dangerous, but as a weapon in people’s hands. They still have off buttons, we still have all the control. But the narrative makes it feel like an inevitability, we’ve all watched too much sci-fi and aren’t using critical thinking skills.

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What if it was 5grams. 5 grams of pysilosybin in complete darkness.

[–] babysmokesalot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You can't get up. A lot of weird shit and sweating. Laughing then crying but then next day... a million bucks. I would do it again. Penis Envy Mushroom Boing

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Was more a quote from Terrance McKenna, but I can get down with some Hamilton. I see you fam.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Preacher says we're living through the rapture

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fucking hell, I hate these damn challenge pages

[–] psyc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Same issue for me on iOS

[–] BabyVi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think these guys really believe the singularity is near. If they did they'd attempt to prevent it, as an actual AGI would not be controllable.

Fuckin' Liz Holmes ass....