this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
309 points (97.0% liked)

politics

30649 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He continued in a similar, ranty vein, “Don’t believe the Radical Left’s Fake Poll numbers. They are Crooked and Corrupt, just like the Country Destroying Dumocrats are Crooked and Corrupt. VOTE REPUBLICAN FOR GREATNESS IN AMERICA!”

Fresh data from CNN puts his approval at a meager 34 percent, matching his post-Jan. 6 trough, while a new AP-NORC poll has him tied at a post-2017 low of 33 percent. Quinnipiac paints an even grimmer picture, dropping him to a career low of 32 percent.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Crazy that 34% still approve of him but I guess realistically it cant get that much lower considering 10% will always be contrarians and 20% is about amount of americans that actively want to destroy the American project. for context I'm not an american

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Rule proposal: no putting Trump's age near the front of the headline unless it's the headline for which we're all waiting.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 4 points 12 minutes ago (1 children)

I actually kind of like it. Nobody ever shut up about how old biden was even though his admin did all the work. Trump is a much worse -- sorry, I mean "hands on" leader, so his age is even more relevant. When he acts like the petulant baby he is journalists should absolutely remind everyone that he's a geriatric.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 minutes ago

Then put it at the end, don't get my hopes up for just a moment only to crush them once again!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] sploder@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

My god seeing that the us president is 80 makes me fucking sick. I hate it here.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

He hadn't had a stroke so far, so the polls are still not bad enough.

Apart from that, how can a third of the country still not grasp what is happening?

That third of the country is what the Republicans rely on, they're their hardcore voting bloc. They will be for anything the Republicans do because "The Democrats are doing it but worse!" They believe that the reason Democrats don't get in trouble so often is they're better at hiding their horrendous acts instead of just not doing them. As well they're generational voters, have voted Republican since Lincoln and never will change.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

A third of the country has been denied adequate education and services because the inequitable distribution of resources towards affluent urban versus poor rural areas.

Democrats have failed to significantly improve the material conditions in some of the poorest areas of the country, so a lot of rural voters feel betrayed and would rather go with the guy who is a outright greedy jerk, than the politician who talks out of the side of their mouth, while still obeying their corporate masters.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

That's not entirely true though. Biden got through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill that invested heavily in developing rural electric and internet. He also supported the USDA ReConnect Program, and several other initiatives. Many of these things that Democrats helped pushed through were celebrated as "wins" by Republican Representatives.

What were they expecting?

Edit". I will say that more investments should have been made in education, but I will always say that we don't invest enough in education.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Edit". I will say that more investments should have been made in education, but I will always say that we don't invest enough in education.

I can’t disagree with that.

And I also have to concede that a lot of rural voters have gotten entrenched into their ultra religious echo chambers, and anything that has to do with public education gets rejected as “woke agenda” to them. So they vote against their own interests.

The problem was created by lack of resources and now that the effects have firmly taken root, it’s hard to reverse course.

[–] Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

perhaps a president that would value justice and holding insurrectionists accountable more than decorum, or who could speak the people more than once a year and was not a grimacing mumbling speech, or for a president to understand he had record levels of unpopularity and was not suited to run again, letting the dems actually provide excitement and pick from a primary of candidates and not the regularly first dropped primary candidate in all her previous attempts

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

This is the real answer. Rural areas have been completely ignored other than subsidies for corporations and wealthy farmers. No funding for schools or hospitals or roads or infrastructure.

So they voted in a way that is counterproductive, that might make their lives worse. That seems silly until you remember their lives were already being made worse.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 5 hours ago

Apart from that, how can a third of the country still not grasp what is happening?

Denial and/or propaganda.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My grandma passed away when she was 82. She could still walk and made some sense sometimes. Usually she was in the present but you could easily catch her talking or interacting with things that had already happened. She was similarly but better at 80. Very grumpy like this guy. Get your popcorn ready, cuz the story is gonna get interesting for this guy.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

My grandma was a real meanie until 80 when she got a small undetected stroke in her sleep and flipped her character to a loving old granny all of a sudden. So the popcorn could go to another direction too, which would be really something.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

Due to the ongoing usa political powerbroker shenanigans, about 1/3 of the american population gave up on the american dream well before trump came on the scene. Once trump started spewing his sweet lies he had them hook, line and sinker. To reiterate, american greed and "business" caused all of this madness then trump came along and capitalized on it.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

"Fuming" and "melts down". Yeah, I'm not reading that article..

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Came here to say the same

I do like that they mention his advanced age in everything though

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Every article be like “so and so is fuming! They had a melt down and slammed another person”.

In reality it be like, “I don’t like cauliflower.”

The exaggeration is getting out of control.

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 37 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

I find it almost unbelievable that 30+% still support him !?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

That’s bedrock cult. The Jesusiest lifetime my daddy was republicans.

Saying they disapprove will never happen. Privately, maybe on the john, say, they may momentarily think it before furtively begging Jebus for forgibness.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I came up with a 20-30% rule. Roughly each quarter of population is always divided into different political camps. It's not what I experimented and surveyed on but it's what I have always observed in terms of voting patterns since history, especially in Europe. The Nazis won only about a quarter of voting population but they had to form a coalition to form a government. Similarly, the various Spanish left wing parties also had to form a coalition with each other before the Spanish Civil War, until the losing right wingers staged a coup to take power sparking the civil war.

If we look at the voting pattern as well in the previous American presidential elections, only 60% of eligible voting population went to the polling booth. More than half of those who voted elected Trump while the other remaining elected Kamala. So, of those who voted, about 30-35% elected for either candidates. Those who did not vote comprise 40% and they did not do so for various reasons. It's safe to assume that of those 40%, half are either liberal/left or right/conservative who did not feel energised by either Kamala or Trump and would rather elect their own preferred candidate (Sanders, Jill Stein, Haley etc).

Those are just my guesstimate but it roughly correlates with voting patterns in various countries if ranked choice voting and proportional representation happens. Even though some countries with no ranked choise and proportional representation, about one quarter of people are of certain inclinations. So, it is unsurprising that 30% of Americans are fascists supporting Trump. Those adjacent or apologists of Trump may not be outright fascists, but are enablers or useful idiots.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

And 30℅ were on the fence about putting an impeached rapist with a history of self enrichment and grifting into the highest office in the land. Apparently they were ok with it.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 12 hours ago

30% of the country are stuck in isolated suburban hellscapes where their main source of information is Fox News, talk radio, and online echo chambers full of people who do the same. Another 30% are also stuck in isolated suburban hellscapes but they’re not stuck in the same dis-information loop.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

30% of any larger group are raving lunatics. This is a universal rule.

[–] jackintosh@feddit.nl 5 points 11 hours ago

Probably closer to 20%, which coincides with the support Hitler had at the last elections his country held before the war.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 168 points 20 hours ago (17 children)

How can 1/3 of Americans think this child rapist is doing a good job?

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

He hates women, black people and minorities in general.

He's loud, crass, obnoxious.

He's tacky.

He's petty.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 102 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hurting brown people and "communists" is more important than anything else to that 1/3.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

btw "communists" are just any people who think the health insurance industry is fucked and way too expensive, and that all people deserve to be treated equally, and that the ultra wealthy shouldn't have as much power as they do.

Has nothing to do with actual communism but the far right propaganda machine is trying to poison any of these ideas with a radioactive word to anyone who remembers the red scare in the 1950s (which, btw, was also a complete bullshit witch hunt because workers were getting too many rights at that point and starting to cut into potential profits of the ultra wealthy cancerous tumors).

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 19 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

btw “communists” are just any people who think the health insurance industry is fucked and way too expensive, and that all people deserve to be treated equally, and that the ultra wealthy shouldn’t have as much power as they do.

It's simpler than that. To them, "communists" and "socialists" are the same, and it's anyone that doesn't think businesses should be able to do anything they want, and any person non-conforming to their personal view of "normal" isn't even human. While most will not, some will even admit both of those publicly.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

To them, “communists” and “socialists” are the same

Like "DEI" and "woke," they're just synonyms for "ME NO LIKE!!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 34 points 18 hours ago (3 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

Assaults on education work

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

REPUBLICAN

VOTERS

LOVE

RAPING

CHILDREN

AND

GENOCIDE

Everyone who ever gaslit you that this wasn't the case was wrong.

Republicans are, at their very best, the parents who know their kids are being raped by an adult, and punish the kid for speaking up about it because it embarrasses them and they rather the child rape happen in the dark.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I have seen two different people recently with a trump 2028 yard sign, and wearing a trump 2028 shirt. People are evil morons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How are the Democrats destroying the country, they aren't in charge.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 7 points 12 hours ago

It's the undrainable deep-state swamp.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Its like comparing bitter chocolate with literal shit. To the voters, theyre equivalent.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 37 points 18 hours ago

Still too high.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

too fucking bad. evil sack of orange shit deserves much worse for all his crooked acts

[–] artyom@piefed.social 42 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

matching his post-Jan. 6 trough

WTF happened in the interim? Fucking bird brains forgot about all the impossibly stupid shit he did and said?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Daily Beast is a crap source

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 17 hours ago

I'm looking forward to celebrating when he drops below 30%. He can do it, I have faith.

load more comments
view more: next ›