this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
772 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87279 readers
3305 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 45 points 6 days ago (10 children)

They're trying to kill the home PC. They'll have all of the computing power and we'll have subscription access.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And they'd get away with it too if it wasn't for those damn Linux distributions.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Look at the long game. Installing a Linux distro is great. But what happens when your GPU/CPU/SSD dies and you can't afford or buy replacements?

They got more time and can afford to wait us out.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Or when they lock the bootloader ala android phones and you're stuck with the default Windows on your laptop?

[–] toadster@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

They literally said that's the plan. Consumers better fight back.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If you are building a new machine for home use and not starting with Linux it's crazy to me. The worst that can happen is you try it for a month or two, hate it, and then buy a windows license.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

try it for a month or two

By then the price of said Windows license would quadruple.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Even at that you can dual boot. You could ween yourself from one to the other to build a daily driver. As Linux has several windows emulators(heroic for example) that you can install and run all your fav window programs anyways.

Linux is like so zero risk it is ridiculous.

[–] Loce@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A year of Linux desktops indeed. I've switched PC and a laptop to Linux and guess what? Works better, faster, more secure and I fucking love it.

Never ever going back to Windows. I might run win10 in virtual pc, but never main host and nothing => 11

[–] PangurBan@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yepppp.

Played around with all of them for a bit. Settled on Bazzite. Dead simple to install and use and it has t given me any issue at all.

Pop OS was kind of nice too, but it needs another year in the oven.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To me this is positive news. The less appealing Windows machines are, the better. Let Windows PC rot peacefully.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (5 children)

While I understand your sentiment about Windows, this is how you end up in a world filled with iPad kids who become adults who accept technology that they don't own.

[–] verily@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

Walking down the aisles of any store selling computers, I can attest to this. If a company can't sell a Windows computer, they will simply sell a Chromebook instead.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago

This is the way of the world right now.

"Oh no, things are going bad for us, raise prices so we will be OK when this dies!"

Screw the future. Sad times.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Microsoft seems intent on pushing people to alternatives. Not only did they quietly remove the higher RAM recommendation, but now the OS is more expensive.

So what people are likely to get an underpowered computer that costs more if they have to buy a new laptop. On the tail of Apple recently releasing a relatively nice and cheap laptop to much fanfare, no less.

It sounds like we're about to see a repeat of the Windows Vista days. Where people hate Windows because it's slow and horrible, and it is slow and horrible because it's running on an underspecced machine barely meant to run the previous version of windows.

[–] kimara@sopuli.xyz 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I didn't expect my PC to become a better investment than my house - until the bubble pops.

Now I also know the feeling of buying something when it was more affordable. I can now dish out advice like "You should just buy fewer boba teas, so you could afford a PC like I did when buying it with my student loan."

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 13 points 6 days ago

Every RAM stick I bought in the past 15 years is worth more per GB now than when I bought it... If you bought RAM in 2008 the same is true, I just didn't buy RAM at that point.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How much ram comes with windows?

All of the AI Copilot ram.

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Lmfao, here comes manufactures selling their own versions of Debian and Fedora. I bet we're going to see a rush of manufacturers selling blank no OS PC's with hardware being the only added on cost.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I have no idea why this makes sense? What about hardware getting more expensive justifies the license for software going up? Is this just because they can?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Volumes are going to be down, but they want the same revenue, so they increase unit price, comfy in the reality that it will still be, percentage wise, not worth it for most to care. Will it make it unaffordable for some? Probably not appreciably more than the hardware is doing all by itself.

So in short, it is just because they can.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

They need the cash to fund their AI spending. There's no conspiracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] noodlesreborn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I LOOOOOOVE not using Windows.

[–] benny@reddthat.com 14 points 6 days ago

Gotta pay off those data center loans.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

purely a cash grab. in no universe of reality is software so tied to memory that it requires a price hike

[–] Damage@feddit.it 9 points 6 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›