this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
497 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

67365 readers
438 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's hope other states follow suit...

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

That might well be the best thing that any government could possibly do to drive open source adoption.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

thanks, California, but we didn't give a shit what you thought in the first place

[–] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Cool now get rid of the law entirely.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

Sensible laws? That's not the world I grew up in. What the hell is happening.

Punish users. That's the only way they'll learn.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So we're taking that code out of systemd, right?

[–] reinerh@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why? There are other countries with similar laws. It's not always (only) about the USA.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

.... Because its a majors privacy violation?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can't you just put 1/1/1900?

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

You can put 1/1/2000 now

Hell, in a couple years you'll be able to put 1/1/2010

Fuck.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago

Well everyone born in the year 1900 is dead, so there's that.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah but its the principle I do not want to nor should I have to put any ifno in to use a piece of tech.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Please stop fighting this distopian law".

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A big win for open source software software.

I'm not so sure. Probably they will block Linux users from certain sites. Not exactly what I'd call a win.

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For now. These kinds of laws always enroach.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait... So if Linux doesn't have the api (sorry, the "signal" 🙄) how will sites that require it respond? What does it mean to be "exempt" - every user is considered to be an adult?

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You're exempt from the service too probably.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Any corporate service that does this doesn't deserve us. Precious.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ehhh, honestly I'm thinking it's more likely they'll block you. That's how these things tend to go in this age.

Kind of like how more and more of the Internet just outright blocks vpns.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is my growing experience of using GrapheneOS.

Mostly everything works just fine. But certain apps don't, because they've made a choice to use Play store integrity. And there are more and more of them, including the UK government ID app. So I can't use my phone to verify my identity because I use a version of Android that's more secure than Google's.

And yeah, I can see it going this way with Linux. If you can't be verified using macOS, Windows, or ChromeOS (or whatever the new thing is) tools, then you become a second class digital citizen.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And that's why we need to build better and better tools for everyone.

[–] gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's very easy, a lot of these huge platforms are just corporate adware and military/intelligence propaganda machines, creating something real with real people will blow it out of the water.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 1 day ago

It's not quite realistic to get feature parity with the huge platforms just on a volunteer basis though. And you might not care about 90% of the features, but that in turn means less adoption, which means less software, less possibilities.

I mean, I too would want all the best things without any of the downsides, but that takes a Huge amount of effort. And I don't see how we can realistically get there without money.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

And why we need people who can hammer it home to our political classes that it's vitally important not to be stuck in an Apple/Google/Microsoft trap.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean that's what "exempt" means in this context.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh I understand what you meant now.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Are you implying "exempt from the service" means Linux gets blocked?

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My tinfoil hat is telling me they’ll do this to make an outlaw of Linux and block it from services and sites. I hope my hat is wrong.

[–] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Keep that tinfoil hat close, I have a feeling Digital identification laws and ReadID technologies are actually moving the internet away from user anonymity, enabling a framework where users can be tied to real-world identities and easily sanctioned.

Make a post on the internet that someone objects to? boom, you just lost access to all your bank accounts.

I mean people connected to Peter Thiel are already bragging how they would love to do that

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's physically impossible to "outlaw Linux". That would mean outlawing the entirety of "The Cloud™".

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You understand this was in the context of the user's side.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

How would you even legislate that? "You can only use Linux if you're a registered business"? And how hard is it to register a one-person business in the US?

"You can only use Linux if your business has over X number of employees"? So make a non-profit business that "hires" anyone who wants to use Linux.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

A game I payed long ago in my mobile requested me last week age verification.

Game lost...

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm old enough to remember the Leisure Suit Larry series that used age verification by asking questions that kids probably wouldn't know (obviously this was long before the internet).

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Game over. User wins.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Colorado already did

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Linux is now the backbone of everything. It you mess Linux up, so many things will break. They realized this finally.

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A new malaphor minted in the wild!

The two expressions you merged were:

  • death knell for (thing)
  • the final nail in the coffin for (something)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I just read it with a southern twang

[–] degen@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"The final death in the coffin" would have some... interesting implications in a couple ways

Edit: also "death nail" means Microsoft started smoking

[–] TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

Death knell.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Linux users are incredible in their belief that issues of privacy, security, or data autonomy will push the masses away from what they're used to (OSX/Windows, Facebook/Reddit, etc) and towards better options (Linux, Lemmy, Mastodon, etc)

No, mate, absolutely nothing is gonna happen to Windows. It's gonna be perfectly fine. If we're lucky, there will be a 1-3% dip in user base towards Linux, but there's exactly 0% chance for a mass exodus that would make the upper management stop and think for a second.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they were assuming that people would use linux to dodge these restrictions. Ex. a teen who can't use a site on windows/ios might boot linux in an attempt to make it work. But as others have pointed out, it's more likely that sites will just blanket-flag a linux useragent as being used by a child to be safe. And then a linux user changing their useragent to get around this will then be hw attestation challenged like any other OS. So yeah, it's just going to make it more inconvenient to use an open system.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless a Linux UA allows for plausible deniability.

It could happen!

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

The first time a child is caught using Linux to circumvent this law, they'll update the law.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

Time to teach kids Linux

[–] nek0d3r@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

I still hoped they'd try to apply it broadly, if only to see the outcome of Ageless Linux