That which Elon Musk hath wrought upon Argentina is now being revisited upon these United States by he
0x0
joined 2 years ago
It's illuminating to ask an LLM a question, and then say it was wrong. In my experience they will do a 180 every time.
Not a lawyer, but I thought trademarks are distinct from copyright. Even if copyright went poof, it's still possible to violate a trademark.
I thought flies use ZZ for the onomatopoeia
This is the same logic people like Kennedy use.
It's not the same logic it all? It's not a huge leap to guess that we're about to have a measles or bird flu pandemic.
Talk to your doctor about whether this would be helpful or effective. Don't just go get vaccines because "if one is good two must be better!"
Did they recommend getting non-evidence-based repeat vaccinations? It just sounded like they recommended getting vaccinations that are not commonly given to US unless they're traveling.
Despite taking the form of a Facebook meme, I believe that it's subverts the medium by actually being funny.
Don't worry, Elon will just announce on X that he and the DOGE boys Neuralink'd Trump's mind into the Starlink satellites. It's totally still Donny calling the shots.
It's gonna be hot Hot HOT!!
I do see where you're coming from!
At some point, I radically rejected the concept of blame for extreme cases — all the way from drunk driving to murder. I think it's necessary to prevent these people who are acting irrationally from hurting others, but it just feels like a waste of my emotional energy to assign blame to someone who's behaving in a way I can't comprehend.
For context, someone in my family was killed when I was a kid. I still feel anger at the perpetrator, but I can't even pretend to understand what would go through their head to make them act the way they did. My conclusion was just that they're basically an alien to me — a broken person who can't be trusted and has to be locked up. But did they commit a sin?
After writing this, I realize it's the same sentiment as "Larry Ellison is a lawnmower."
Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphizing Larry Ellison. You need to think of Larry Ellison the way you think of a lawnmower. You don’t anthropomorphize your lawnmower, the lawnmower just mows the lawn - you stick your hand in there and it’ll chop it off, the end. You don’t think "oh, the lawnmower hates me" – lawnmower doesn’t give a shit about you, lawnmower can’t hate you. Don’t anthropomorphize the lawnmower. Don’t fall into that trap about Oracle.
view more: next ›
Are you arguing that assembly languages are not architecture-specific? I don't think that's the typical definition.
Nasm is an assembler, but it also represents a specific assembly language targeting x86 architectures.
Gas is an assembler of a higher order. It can emit code for many architectures, and thus it accepts many different architecture-specific assembly languages.