Flippanarchy

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Very cool. Thanks!

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Val@anarchist.nexus [S] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

If you want to use this here's a slightly fixed and png'd version: An image made of white lines on a black background. A faceless person stands in front of a crowd speaking into a microphone. In the crowd are raised fists and empty flags. In the background are buildings. The quote "We live in capitalism it's power seems inescapable, so did the divine right of kings" is at the top of the image.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Added. Cheers!

parent

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago (54 children)

Did your last line betray your use of AI?

hideshow 54 child comments

[–] Val@anarchist.nexus [S] 11 points 1 month ago (53 children)

I haven't used any AI. This is traced over the https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/anarchism banner. That banner was generated, like most db0's comms.

But I have wondered about doing this to images generated myself. I think it's an interesting counter-argument to the "AI" hardliners. If I claim no ownership of the generated output or even my own work based on that output is it still stealing? And if the image was generated in a climate-friendly manner, like through AI Horde or Ecosia, is it still problematic?

hideshow 53 child comments

parent

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 month ago

This is traced over the https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/anarchism banner. That banner was generated, like most db0's comms.

I think there's something kinda poetic about this. Like if we adopt your banner, it shows that we're not repudiating the old banner or the people who made it, but that we are adapting to the needs of our time. And it's really pretty too ancom-heart

parent

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago (25 children)

If I claim no ownership of the generated output or even my own work based on that output is it still stealing?

No such thing as 'stealing' when it comes to generative AI output. AI output cannot be copyrighted at all. It's all free for the taking.

hideshow 25 child comments

parent

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

No such thing as ‘stealing’ when it comes to ~~generative AI output~~ Copying digital assets.

Fixed it for you. Copyright violations are not stealing. That includes creating unauthorized derivative works.

For generative AI it's even more meaningless because it can't be copyrighted.