Nearly 130 countries on Saturday agreed on a text defining lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) - "killer robots" to their critics - a first step towards talks on a possible international treaty to regulate them.

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

US, China and Russia won’t sign it. The longer I live the more I wonder why small countries want to handicap themselves against aggression this way. Any country will withdraw from this, same as with mines and cluster munitions, when they get a whiff of being threatened. By then they will be late in development of those new weapons and forced to buy them from US or China or Russia, to double the irony.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Guess which countries will just ignore that?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    I really think that this is one of those "you can't put the genie back in the bottle" type situations. Any attempt to keep it from happening is good, but I do think that it's far too late.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The treaties for landmines and nuclear weapons have had some effect. I think, maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    When Russia invaded Ukraine, all the European border countries immediately mined the border territories 🤷 arms control is a peacetime publicity move. As soon as war becomes a possibility we fire up the meat-grinder. And even more perversely, we celebrate it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I think we all know what the problem is going to be here. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't try.

  • source