this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
65 points (94.5% liked)

science

17768 readers
152 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sometimes I feel like something doesn't need to be studied, and we can just use common sense.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

For sure, but it's still nice to actually have the data to back it up.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I feel like it's probably good to study it, but there's no need to report it to the news media.

[–] ragica@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Also kind of interesting to know there is a quantifiable methodology for rating chewing capabilities, which could potentially be used in other studies.

Anyhow I suspect when we are old and don't understand what is happening to our weakening bodies some of us may have a greater appreciation for this particular study.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m not going to look it up and assume that the chewing scale is rated based on how hard the patient bites the researcher.

[–] SkaraBrae@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This is the only logical conclusion.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It's not quite that quantitative:

Participants were asked, “Can you chew hard food such as hard bread or apples?” with three possible response options: (1) “Yes, without difficulty”, indicating no issues with chewing hard food; (2) “Yes, but I must be careful”, reflecting some difficulty or the need to adjust chewing habits, such as taking smaller bites or chewing more slowly to avoid discomfort; and (3) “No, not at all”, indicating a complete inability to chew hard food

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Look at this optimist thinking we're going to get old.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Be careful being. Sometimes the pessimistic view is that you will grow old. Don't be like me and plan for a massive coronary to end your suffering at age 50.

Turns out my family has disturbingly good genes, and there's a chance I'm stuck for a long time yet.

I'll have to wait and see which side of the family I take after. Not counting accidents and other premature bucket-kicking events, one half has a few who didn't make it to 60, the other tends to get almost to the triple digits before keeling over.

I'd put the differences down to environment and lifestyle for the most part though, got some heavy drinkers and heavier eaters among our early departures and at least one cancer linked to a hazardous chemical exposure. Might not kill you right away unless you drown/choke/melt but it's enough to knock a few decades off the lifespan.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would be crazy if the opposite was true.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

"Inability to eat creates immortal superhuman"

This study brought to you by the New England Journal of Fucking Duh.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Time for soups! Mushroom in beans...pressure cook for 1hr and add spices to your taste. That's the stuff of life.