this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
1444 points (99.4% liked)

memes

15641 readers
3110 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, useless meetings are great for timesheet filler while playing Pokemon Go.

[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Sometimes my wife says she doesn't like so much downtime at work. I understand her frustration, but I don't empathize.

Pay me to slack off, that's the life.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago

#Corpo-Pro-Tips

[–] EldenLord@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, fuck this lickspittle corpo speak!

"What is the purpose of this meeting and why do I need to be included?" is a perfectly polite sentence appropriate in any work environment consisting of mature and distinguished adults.

Do not enslave yourself to the machine, because the people running it will treat you like a slave.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

consisting of mature and distinguished adults

That part can actually be problematic in many places in my experience.

[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 3 points 12 hours ago

I often find that misappropriating an out of context Paul Rudd quote arguably condoning sexual harassment works perfectly to describe the level of effort one should put in;

"Work 60% of the time, Alllll the time"

Any more than 60% effort and it becomes a drain, any less and management will look to replace. 60% effort is the sweet spot for surviving corporate life rather than succumbing to it.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

Corpospeak. Never a clearer way to be sure that someone or something doesn’t give a fuck about you as a human being.

[–] Bill@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

What do I need prepare for my contribution in this meeting? Nothing. Ok I'll watch the recoding.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Y'all are invited to optional meetings??? Lol

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The original way the first person asked was polite, if intoned gently.

The recommended response is corpospeak.

Corpospeak is never polite.

It just pretends to be.

Like a sociopath.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Corpospeak [...] Like a sociopath.

And this is why LLMs are so well suited for the task! People get genuinely excited by the prospect of using AI to read/reply email... because they don't mean actual thoughtful email written with intent, maybe even emotions or even reasoning. No... no they mean corpospeak that is entirely pointless, empty of meaning and definitely written for a human by human, but rather for a cog, to another lifeless cog in the corporation.

This is why people are investing tons of money and expending tons of CO2.

What a fucking farce of a species we are.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Bullshit corpospeak tasks is pretty much the only time I use LLMs. You want us to come up with a paragraph long department motto? Could someone ask ChatGPT and put all of our names under it so none of us waste time from our lives on such a retarded task.

[–] socrates@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago

All things considered our species is doing relatively well. Having the ability to assign purpose and use tools does cause us to get stuck in a stupid rut all too often, though.

I can't fathom why a person would willingly use corpospeak. I can't imagine anyone actually likes to speak that way.

I would invite the reader to always call it out when it occurs, and call for all involved parties to speak plain.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

True but that seems to be what she was actually asking for. Her question would be too straightforward, she wanted to get out of the meeting without even hinting at that

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The corpospeak way to ask for how to say something in corpospeak would be more like...

I want to say/ask "...", what would be an appropriate way to phrase this in a professional setting?

But yes, phrasing corpospeak is almost always designed such that someone not well versed in it would believe that what is being said is not extremely direct, is not extremely clear, is somewhat ambiguous, a bit more verbose than is necesarry to be concise.

However, if you have worked in a lot of corpojobs... you fairly rapidly learn what phrases actually mean. It just requires some familiarity with the specific situational context, and the way corpo business structure/culture works in general.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Direct Corporate speak would be.

"Do you need me in this meeting?"

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I would argue that isn't corpospeak.

It is just normal speech.

Which would essentially be a faux pas for anyone other than C suite to do, to drop the dialect.

Only those that are very powerful/respected within the org can get away with dropping the dialect, there has to be a power disparity.

Like, a VP could say that in an internal check up meeting on some team or project.

But they could not say that in a quarterly earnings report in front of investors, it would be a faux pas to drop the dialect because the power/respect differential is less.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 27 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I work on the floor in a pretty specialized role, so I can always just use the excuse of having to attend to any given machine coincidentally whenever they want to have a meeting I don't feel like attending.

None of the managers really understand what we do, so they don't challenge the excuses ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 34 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

When I started my career I quickly became convinced that meetings are the opposite of work. Now a large part of my career is hosting meetings. 😬

My biggest piece of advice to junior staff is: if you're not provided an agenda prior to a meeting, your attendance is not required. RSVP with Yes if it sounds interesting/beneficial and you have the time, otherwise Nope (or Tentative) your way out of it.

The obvious caveat is if that meeting is called by someone with role power over you. In which case: as they clearly don't respect your time, it's on you to (politely) ask them to provide an agenda. It may also indirectly train them to be less shit.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Meeting host here too Agenda : defective thingamajig from supplier

  • agenda Hello everu one we suspect that some mcguffins have been shipped with defectives turbo-encubalators. We have 24h to decide if we need to informed government agency

Inventory people - please identify origine of the turbo-encubalators and deliveries Engineers -please make risk assessment form, we strongly suspect defective product are in service.

Providing agenda is only useful if people fucking read it and inform themselves on the subject before coming in. Hi everybody why am I here? - you were supposed to evaluate the safety risk for customer using this defective component we discovered. - oh Why me? -you are the engineer that designed the part Can't the supplier do the investigation, I have to make a report to my boss to identify where we can cut support

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Agreed.

I didn't mention that I also spend time after every meeting I host putting together a summary of what was discussed along with a bullet point list of deliverables, who agreed to work on them, and due dates and then send it to all attendees, invitees, and stakeholders.

It deals with the Spider-Man pointing at Spider-Man meme problem and "magnanimous work dodgers" - those who promise the world in meetings but then seemingly disappear off the planet.

It probably should be noted that many of the meetings I host are recurring, often weekly or fortnightly, so it's easy to find a rhythm (and identify the problem children).

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

When I started my career I quickly became convinced that meetings are the opposite of work. Now a large part of my career is hosting meetings. 😬

I feel/felt similarly but I am now calling for meetings because it seems to be the easiest way to get my peers and superiors to do their fucking job so that I'm not stuck in limbo waiting for their parts to be finished. It seems like they only respond to slack mentions / emails / task assignments at random which leaves important, unanswered requests/questions just sitting there.

Sorry, this past year I've been working with another department for a project that, due to aforementioned woes, has run about 6-12 months more than it needs to.

I'm in the public sector and everyone is very busy and pulled in many directions so I kind of get it... but I want to be done with this thing.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need to set meetings. You need to set deadlines.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I've tried deadlines. I've asked for things to be done before our next meeting with the vendor we're working with. Hell, almost everything I need done is clearly conveyed as "I cannot proceed to move your project forward until you perform X task that I don't have the rights to perform or make a decision regarding your department's policy on X." In fact, I've shown up at the meetings with them and the vendor and literally told them the situation - they do everything that's piled up in like 5-10 minutes and are apologetic. Then two days later I need another small thing and it begins again. So now I call for a meeting to "go over the project days the next vendor meeting." I really just have a list of shit I can't work on for the next vendor meeting because ya'll don't respond to all my requests otherwise.

Also remember, some of these are directed at my superiors - like the boss of the department I'm working with. It's their project so it's not like I'm getting in trouble or missing my deadlines. It just murders my flow state and frustrates me to no end when it can take days or weeks to get a response.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 168 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Meetings are the viable alternative to work. Meetings that you don't need to contribute to are even better. Take a break. Catch some zees.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

yeah what the fuck; when you're asked to do nothing on company time, you take it!

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 101 points 1 day ago (1 children)

go to meetings to avoid other meetings

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I go to meetings so I don't have to work

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Problem is, that the work is still there after the meeting

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is definitely a difference between people that believe the work they do is important and people just punching a clock.

I teach at a community college (salaried) and my partner works as staff in the same school (hourly). She works her ass off, but when she gets to the end of the day, she is done and leaves work at the office, so attending meetings is no big deal to her. Meanwhile, I've gotten involved enough in peripheral committee work that I regularly stay up working until 1AM because there are literally not enough hours in the day to get done what needs to get done. I could try to leave work at work, but I'd be hanging students and fellow instructors out to dry, so that's not always an option.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could try to leave work at work, but I'd be hanging students and fellow instructors out to dry, so that's not always an option.

Not your problem that your college hasn't decided to fund enough positions to get things done within the workday.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's not my fault, but it is definitely my problem if I'm in a position to help people and decide not to. Make no mistake, I raise holy hell while I'm doing it, but the lack of workers doesn't lessen the amount of work that needs to get done. Maybe it's just naivete, but I'm idealistic enough to believe that helping students is the most important thing I can do, so I only say yes to things that are directly helping students, faculty, and staff (admin and their busy work can fuck right off with their bloated salaries and support staff)

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 12 hours ago

Never do more than what is in your contract.

It is not like the company is going to pay you more than what is written in there. So why should you compensate when they clearly wouldn't?

It is not your job to get everything done. But it is their job to make sure there are enough people for the work available.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

One thing I’ve learned is that sometimes you need to let the problems happen. You can raise hell and keep talking about how more hands are needed, but unless issues actually start coming up and affecting people, then no one is going to care/listen.

I had a job in the past that was vastly understaffed. I kept getting more and more, and working longer hours. I brought this up with management many times but nothing was happening. “Not in the budget to hire more” is what I kept getting.

When it got to be too much, I decided I would only work 40 hours, and whatever happens, happens. Our lives are too short to be wasted away at work.

So tasks started to take longer, and whenever something needed doing, it was added to the queue and prioritized appropriately. Sometimes that meant I couldn’t get to it in weeks. At first, I came under fire. “Why haven’t you done this yet??” But each time I explained my situation. “There’s not enough hands and I am doing the best I can with the resources given to me”. And guess what? Most people empathized and understood my predicament. So now I have an army of colleagues who understand the issue here, and now the issue gets more visibility with management as more people rally to my side.

A few months of this, and they decide to hire two more positions to help with the overload of work.

It’s a risky move for sure. They could just fire you and dig themselves into a deeper hole. But then if they do that, is that really the type of environment you’d want to work in anyway?

People are surprisingly understanding when you explain yourself. You don’t need to fix everything and everyone’s problems. Sometimes the best thing you can do is to let the problems happen and observe how others deal with it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I used to work at this company where like 3 guys took care of basically everything. All but one of them, let's call him Rob, eventually left to better companies. About a month after that, my team had to deal with a pretty big issue and we were having trouble coming up with a solution so this idiot had the brilliant idea to page Rob. As if the poor guy hadn't spent the last month doing the job of 3 people who were already doing the job of a 5 people each. Rob got online, said "Why did you page me?" and immediately left before getting a response. I liked Rob.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

lol classic Rob!

[–] t_berium@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

'Do you really need me? I still have a lot on my desk and would like to get to work on it, if you don't mind.'

Never did anyone have an issue with that, including my boss.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 22 points 23 hours ago

The beauty of this is its not using brainrot LinkedIn language

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I told my team to decline meetings they don't think they should be in. If they're really needed, they can be added - everyone is supposed to be available/reachable during the day anyway. I told them that this includes meetings that I invite them to.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Had a manager saying that. Declined meeting. Manager: Pikachu-face.

Had to attend anyways ofc. Wasted my time 100% + the time the manager "explained" why I couldn't just decline a meeting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Email recap never comes. Miss out on key decision points. Attend next meeting. Nothing is agreed just talk for the sake of talking. Objections disregarded. Side meeting happens without you. Key points agreed with management in your absence. You're just a cog in a giant hamster wheel. Not even the hamster. Cry at night.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Some meetings, I wish I'd bought a steamdeck.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago

Meeting summary:

  • Synergy promoted by Gerald
  • Fourth quarter prediction estimate forecasts brainstormed by Jeremy.
  • Coffee situation update from Mark.
  • Level 4 agility in KCD reached by GreatAlbatross
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›