That seems pretty short though, surely it would mean you are not allowed to live, work or even vist the same town they live or work in.

Like if anyone I knew was to be my stalker, one of us would have to quit their job and sell their house to relocate.

...and a great security/relief for victims. I'm a vivid apologetic for privacy and security, but this seems like an acceptable thing.

People seem to be fine to be transparent and 24/7 surveilleid with their phones. Some even seem to be fine to install doorcams from US-bigtech or spy-devices that can switch on a light. Heck, they even pay for those!

This at least is a vers useful application of privacy invasion.

You know what? I'm OK with a panopticon specifically for convicted stalkers. I realize the potential for a slippery slope, but I think the risk is worth it in this one case.

It only shows their location within a certain range.

And considering that this is a punishment for violating someone else's privacy I can get behind this.

Living on Earth is a nightmare from a privacy perspective.

They have space binoculars pointed at you & AI is allowing them to transcribe everything you say into words even they can understand

That's a lot cooler than the absolutely nothing they do in the US for stalking victims.

This makes more sense since I was thinking if it's based on their gps activity from their phone, that can be spoofed lol

Fun fact: Waluigi is famously the evil version of Luigi

South Korea gives corporate employees app to track their CEO?

Time to grab the flame thrower

Like another commenter said. Stalking victims already have to move to avoid their stalkers. This puts that responsibility on the offender rather than the victim. And a good relief for the victims

I have no idea, but if I had to guess based on a couple of court cases that came up on youtube, the stalker has some carve out where they can go to work, but they have to take very inconvient ways to get there to minimize proximity to the victim.