They met at a bar in midtown Manhattan. He arrived wearing a baseball cap pulled low and sported a pair of black-framed glasses, she says. As conversation flowed, from discussions about navigating life in New York to past relationships, he mentioned that his glasses were Meta Ray-Bans.

“I wasn’t familiar with them,” McAnuff, a 28-year-old project manager who now lives in Toronto, tells WIRED. It was her first time seeing the smart glasses up close, which can record images and video from the wearer’s viewpoint. He let her try them on and even showed her a couple of videos that he’d taken previously, she says. “That was it. We stopped talking about it after that. I figured that was the end of the use.”

The next day, checking her Instagram, McAnuff noticed she’d been tagged in one of his story posts. To her surprise, it was footage of them at the bar and on the subway together, en route to a basketball game uptown. In the video, McAnuff is captured from an above angle, sitting across from her date who is holding a drinking glass; WIRED has seen screenshots of the footage. “I felt super violated,” McAnuff says. “Like, what if I don’t want everyone knowing what I’m up to? He felt so free to film me and post it. There was no conversation about it.”

Meta sold more than 7 million pairs of the Ray-Bans in 2025, as its smart glasses have infiltrated public spaces thanks to pranksters with dreams of viral fame, some of whom even film people while they’re at work. The phenomenon, which has also spread to pickup artists hitting on women, has earned the hardware the nickname “creep glasses.”

Among singles, and particularly women, Meta’s AI-powered eyewear has become a recurring nuisance, as people share a spreading unease about being covertly filmed on dates.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 132 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Men Wearing Meta Glasses on Dates Is an Instant Red Flag

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    I've read this story about it where the people who bought them stopped wearing them within a few weeks because they felt uncomfortable wearing them - common theme was, when people notice you were those glasses they shun you and find an excuse to end the conversation. Guess people in general agree with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I thought the convention was to call them "perv glasses"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 2 weeks ago (29 children)

    *people wearing creep glasses is a red flag

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 61 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    How fucked up do you have to be to wear these to a date?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Where is the "hue hue people have cameras in their phone and you have no problem with that, checkmate" guy...I know you're in here.

    The Instagram part of the story perfectly highlights the difference. Busting out a camera to start filming the entire date so I can make a highlight reel later is way more conspicuous than simply wearing my glasses. One leads to a discussion while the other is inconspicuous and likely never had consent in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is the only sane take on perv glasses.

    If someone pulled out their phone to photograph me on our first date, I'd nip that in the bud, and maybe just walk away. I guess I might be okay if there was a scenic background and they said "want to get a selfie together?" but a photo just of me across the table? Creepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

    And with a conversation about it all that can be laid out and consented to.

    Hey this view is really pretty can we take a selfie? Sure!

    Later that evening: Hey that photo came out good, do you mind if I post it to my Instagram? I'd prefer if you didn't.

    Okay no problem.

    It doesn't need to be any more complicated than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    7 million? People actually bought this?

    Jeez there's a lot of perverts in the world

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago

    Anyone wearing these anywhere is a huge red flag.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Pervert glasses.

    They’re called pervert glasses.

    Get it right, Wired.

    And let’s also lay it all out: the only people wearing them are sick enough in the head to need immediate institutionalization. Full stop, end of story.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    My Meta Glasses memeable thought of the day:

    If you feel violated when a private citizen follows you around with a camera, might want to also feel violated when the state follows you around with millions of cameras.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago

    Oh, how fun. Now we'll all be even more repressed because literally every interaction will be recorded and you better not do anything cringe.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    So you mean if I buy these I don't have to talk to people? Where do I sign up?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    The key is buying a pair of regular glasses that look similar enough, and put some logo stickers on to fake it. Then, you don't support evil, and you still don't have to talk to people. Win win!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Velma Idk what it is about your post but they seem to make the misogynists crawl out of the network. Always multiple people telling on themselves in the comments. Not every post with "Men" in the title needs someone saying "b-but women!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm old enough to remember when Google came out with their version. People went appoleptic and cried invasion of privacy. What happened, why were these not shunned in the same way? It's our because they just look like sun glasses? The only acceptable use for these is to aide blind people

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›