all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Lol if anybody else was doing what USA is doing, USA would be doing anything to stop that somebody else from doing what the USA is already doing. Fucking hypocrites

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The United States view of nuclear proliferation is that the world can only be safe if only the United States has nuclear weapons.

    Because no other country can be trusted with nuclear weapons.

    In some ways, this world view makes you realize that North Korea and Iran might have a legit point to continue to develop nukes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have been saying similar things about the USA and how they handle a number of things.

    If any majority Muslim nation was doing what Israel is doing, the USA would stop at nothing to stop them.

    Been true for at least three decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Thats kind of the foundational precept of imperialism. You have the be the only one. Its not about autonomous entities entitled to their own self determination, its abour conquest and being the one at the top that can exploit all the others

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well, it's official. Humanity is going to be forever stranded on earth by debris. That's a little sad.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    US claims they have weapons in space. Ftfy

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    After the world agreed to not put weapons in space.

    How y'all feel about a deranged narcissistic manchild having weapons over your house right now? Pretty great I bet!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Yeah apparently the world agreed and didn't assume the US would fall as far as to elect someone who thought being told no was just a speed bump for whatever he was trying to do, which is mostly anything that lines his pockets as long as he has no real obligations to actually be a leader of a nation.

    Seriously, what the fuck? Course easy to see the lines from poor education and a shit load of propaganda that says the people making things worse are really protecting the hard working folk, and you have to trust them or you're on the wrong side of a book of morales/philosophy they never actually understood anyways.

    It's quite genius really but awful for betterment of society and humans. One bit of critical thinking works and the whole house of cards topples unless they're in the sunk cost fallicy time. Course they made sure that wasn't likely via the propaganda.

    It's maddening to know how easily manipulated we can be, and I'm not American but definitely try extra hard these days to understand anything I read and put it in context before accepting as written. Imagine what we could accomplish if we didn't have to keep doing that for everything we read?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I guess we have to thank the Trump admin's incompetence for announcing this. Even though, I have no doubt that Putin in particular doesn't care for any treaty if it gets in his way.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    They didn't say what kind, though. Likely the Trump admin bluffing while low on interceptors.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Claude, fire zee missiles!

  • source