cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52022727

Looks like everyone who raised awareness about "Mark Zuckerberg Pervert Glasses" ultimately made a real difference <3

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones [...]

So the glasses will still record innocent bystanders without consent, only without video? That's not much better. The shaming will and should continue.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.

    Should we shame people with phones if their phone has a microphone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    No, we shouldn't shame people for using a device that happens to have a microphone. But we absolutely should shame people who knowingly and flagrantly use recording devices with a complete disregard to other people's privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Honestly, I personally even barely care about the individual people who do this - that's been a thing for nearly 20 years now. Don't get me wrong - secretly filming people is creepy as fuck, and it's rightly illegal without consent in a lot of places.

    But I'm more pissed off about is that beside the individuals, it's also being saved by corporations on an unprecedented and almost inconceivable scale. But it doesn't even stop at that massive privacy invasion - that data is then used, processed and extrapolated to wring every known piece of data out of it, to make a profit for those companies. Plus, since it's stored, they will also use it in the future, in ways we haven't even considered right now.

    All of which without you knowing, or your consent. Creeps are one problem, but imho it's nothing compared to the companies that actually profit from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.

    Where? In my country (Spain) has never been prohibited in public spaces, except in recent years that record the police has been forbidden. ACAB

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    Point being that you didn’t need to ask for consent before any more than now. It might be illegal, but who cares, really?

    Over here it’s legal to record any conversation you are a part of or can “reasonably hear”. So no parabolic shotgun mics allowed 😀

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    In the US that varies by state. California is "two party consent" so you need permission. If you just mean you can do it illegally, tape recorders have been around since way before the 1980s.

    In some countries the camera apps on phones are required to make a shutter noise when you take a picture so it's harder to do secretly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So now you can buy the pervert glasses and all the public hatred without even getting to be a pervert. Genius.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I had a showerthought about the incident with the gym manager wearing pervglasses - what if it was all kept on a central server, no user access with ~2 week deletion, it's just an employee-worn security camera.

    But then I thought, Deus Ex wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Or they found a way to hide the camera from the users and now you're grabbing video that you don't have access to or even know about. Check out the matte black lens covers that are essentially just windows from one side.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    I heard that these are piracy devices intended for recording copyrighted music!

  • source