The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it is launching a drinking water quality study to look for traces of abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol for the first time.

Anti-abortion activists, attorneys general, and lawmakers have been lobbying for the agency to carry the study for years.

Researchers at the agency will collect water samples “from several locations in different metropolitan areas” and test them for thousands of drugs, pesticides and synthetic chemicals, including mifepristone, misoprostol, and multiple types of "forever chemicals," according to a description of the study.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 5 days ago

It kinda sucks that something like this is being done for an anti-abortion agenda rather than interest in keeping our water clean and safe to drink.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 5 days ago

    this is just fucking vile.

    that'd be like using the surveillance state to screen for immigrants instead of pedophiles. oh wait a hot second...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Meanwhile my drinking water is tasting moldy for a week and the city doesn't really know why or when it will end. It's great

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 days ago

    Totalitarianism eventually falls because they waste so much time micromanaging. But before it does fall, a lot will get hurt in the process.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 days ago

    This place fucking sucks. I sick of it. Mentally and physically.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago

    No amount of hate is too much to hold against these people.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    What about all the forever chemicals of.... (Insert numerous chemicals that when you can measure it it's already 1000x the amount it should be)?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    LOL.. but not bacteria and viruses.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

    Drinking water? You mean waste water?

    Edit: nope, they're testing drinking water. Well, that's good I guess. I don't know how the hell abortion drugs would get into drinking water, but it would be very bad if we found it there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago

    yeah , what? So their concern is that drinking water is being 'contaminated' by a number of drugs including abortion drugs. I am not sure how that would be happening but yeah better than trying to track people down via waste water. Strange.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago

    Time to fix up that ol' outhouse out back. Yep.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    “I think what’s concerning here is that there’s already a culture of criminalization around abortion, especially since Dobbs [v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization], and the potential to use this as justification for further surveillance could create more fear for abortion seekers, for providers at a time when folks are already being criminalized and for their pregnancy outcomes, including abortion,” Anna Bernstein, principal federal policy adviser for the Guttmacher Institute, told The Hill.

    Nathan Donley, the environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, told the outlet mifepristone is not one of the known contaminants on the EPA's list to regulate.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (2 children)

    It has alleged that as women increasingly use the abortion pills at home to terminate pregnancies, flushing the expelled tissue, traces of the pill make their way to water supply, contaminating it. 

    That's fucked, if true.

    One, don't flush any drugs. Take it to a pharmacy and ask them to dispose of it properly.

    Two, anything flushed should end up in a wastewater treatment facility. If the waste water is somehow contaminating your drinking water, that sounds like a clean water act violation, and the government should be investigated and fined repeatedly until this is fixed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago
    1. A waste water treatment facility has extreme limitations on what it can clean, and literally just gets it to the won't-kill-the-environment level. Hormones, viruses, etc are too small to effectively process on a massive scale. New York for example, still sometimes releases raw sewage because they can't keep up.
    2. Trump and the Supreme Court have basically gutted the clean water act. If it's not navigable, the law doesn't apply to it.
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›