Timestamps:

00:00​ Intro

00:36​ Sponsor: TuxCare

01:46​ KDE's AI policy

06:42​ Existing AI policies

10:06​ Going further on AI

12:58​ My stance on AI

17:05​ FOSS projects: yes or no to AI?

28:02​ Sponsor: Tuxedo Computer

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 3 days ago* (8 children)

Ridiculous anti-AI hysteria is pushed by the AI companies themselves to make the anti-AI side look insane. Don't fall for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago*

    the hysteria is taking on a new life of its own and i guess it makes sense considering how people's materials conditions are being diminished on our education system as well as our media doesn't enable us to understand why or how.

  • source
  • parent
  • I mean, I'm not sure the hysteria is completely unreasonable. AI does pose multiple legitimate threats and should be used responsibly, and not trusted with certain duties. We've also seen that the powers that be treat the world around them like a fratboy treats a drunken co-ed (it's meant to be disgusting), and that the constant growth demanded by the shareholders leaves no room for ethics, morals, or big-picture thinking.

    I use AI. I also built my own for simple tasks. I've had a lot of experiences with AI at this point, and its generous to say the pros-cons are a wash. The use-cases I and most normies see is AI expediting an already blazing fast enshitification of everything around us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    I feel like a lot of the online discord about it are Chinese/Russian bots generating “look at how unreliable AI is” pictures to manipulate the western powers to shoot itself in the foot. And they use those of us on the left to do it because are greatest Strength is our emotions but it’s also the easiest way to manipulate us.

    Outrage works really well on my fellow leftists. And AI makes them so freaking emotional now, it blinds them I feel. Just like we have learned that a tooon of the online outrage from the BLM movement was bot(not literal bot) generated. And it made us look insane and that’s how we partially got trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Might not be user-facing AI slop tools, but the code sure seems to be more and more AI LLM stuff:

    https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333 (At least that's what the pushback from multiple contributors against the notion that perhaps LLM code shouldn't be fed into KDE, seems to suggest.)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Thankfully the culture of Linux power users (I am not one) is firmly anti-AI. There are several reasons for this, and not all are altruistic, but it's the right approach to have. Dummies like me have to use it for commands, codes, and scripts, but I'm not going to be submitting ANYTHING to any kind of actual project, because I recognize my incompetence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    I'm getting a lot of questions about KDE becoming an AI desktop that I feel like is answered by my "KDE is not becoming an AI desktop" video.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 3 days ago (15 children)
  • [–] 31 points 3 days ago (11 children)

    I prefer this response to Gerard's rant:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    MaddieM added even more that I thought was salient in another response:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    defeats the point of a CoC (making sure everyone feels safe, particularly minorities who are targeted by fascism)

    I'd argue that if we normalize people barging into random threads and accusing others of facism, that would make everybody feel unsafe. Remember that once you normalize this behavior, the fascists can use it too.

    ... ends up creating a scandal ...Very visibly, I might add.

    The person who barged in making public accusations, is the one that created a visible scandal. That's why there's a proper channel for reports. Precisely to prevent this sort of mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    MaddieM advocated for removing the post, that's not even close to "normalizing" it imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    Just removing the post without any punishment to the user, just means the user can do it again.

    A ban is fairly harsh I admit, but usually bans only happen for repeat offenders. I don't know the full context here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    we should normalize accusing fascists of fascism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Yeah. The point is that it can be a slippery slope. Everybody (myself included, I have to be honest bcs well, I'm a very stupid human after all) will be calling anything we don't like something fascist, thus making it a worthless term. That's what actual fascism want.

    Thus, we should be way more careful with the use of that word.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Why not ban person A? Being a nazi is a rule violation, but reporting people by barging in on unrelated threads (instead of simply contacting the mods) is also a rule violation.

    Somebody else can report the nazi via proper channels, and person A learns the proper way to report people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    Bringing an on-going discussion from outside into a thread with which it bore no relationship, The correct way to proceed is to alert mods, sysadmins or another participant in the discussion privately. What happened is akin to someone walking into a restaurant and seemingly randomly punching another patron. They're going to get thrown out.

    Damn what a completely out of touch response. Many people point out that this was basically a badly handled abuse report that a user brought to a main thread instead of reporting, however that does not and never did justify the original and continued ban of the first person to report on it.

    I am especially galled by the "and ad hominem attacks on another user (even if it turned out they deserved it)." bit. Dude, maybe someone's motivations matter. Acting like attacking someone's motivations are always out of place is part of what lets this kind of shit fester and grow. Everyone has motivations, and a lot of people's motivations are deeply unsavory.

    Bruh my Kubuntu minimal install. Welp. *sigh que sera sera, we all move on sometime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    I guess kde publicly addressing AI usage goes to show how much this fear has become mass hysteria

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Why is a .ml user advocating for something used to take bargaining power away from workers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    your comment seems to imply that i'm a marxist because i'm on lemmy.ml -- i'm not (as most arent), but i do understand material dialectics & history well enough to know that hysteria like this never has and never will stop change from happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Actually happy with Umbriel + Noctalia. Last straw to KDE is I prefer QT over GTK.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    Just use i3 and not KDE lol

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    tainted

    I recently used that word as hyperbole to make fun of a user who insisted that AI-less comments from someone who used AI once should count as AI.

    I didn't know the cult actually uses that word. How far will the insanity go?

  • source
  • parent