Star Wars: Galactic Racer Gives Me What I Want: To Go So Fast That I Explode : gaming@beehaw.org

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

It looks like fun but not $60 worth of fun.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Yea. It's a $30 game at best.

Not saying it's a bad game just it isn't a full priced title. It's an arcade game with a pretty coat of paint and a popular IP attached.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] HER0@beehaw.org 1 point 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Not saying it’s a bad game just it isn’t a full priced title.

I understand the complaint that it doesn't have enough content for the price, and that's fair if that's how you feel. However, new AAA games these days are 70 to 80 USD. $60 isn't the full price for a AAA game anymore.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Those are overcharged titles. $60 is the full price of a game. Anything over is an overcharged title. I refuse to accept the attempt to inflate the price of games by the bigger publishers.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] HER0@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is $60 the full price and not $50, as was the standard for AAA titles before that?

When accounting for inflation, both a $60 game purchased in 2021 (just 5 years ago, when that was still the norm for AAA games) and a $50 game purchased in 2001 are more expensive than buying a $70 AAA game in 2026. Meanwhile, AAA game budgets have exploded.

Another way to look at it: Galactic Racer in 2026, at $60, would be $49 in 2021 or $32 in 2001 when accounting for inflation.

Galactic Racer feels like a AA game, and has a modern AA price, both relative to new AAA game prices for the last few years and relative to prices in the past when accounting for inflation. It is fair to not like that or feel it is overpriced, but it does line up.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

If anyone's curious:

$60/$49 = ~1.22, or ~22% more from 2021 to 2026 (~4.5%/yr) $49/$32 = ~1.53, or ~53% more from 2001 to 2021 (~2.7%/yr)

Time periods are vastly different of course (5y vs 20y) but inflation has accelerated drastically since the pandemic (specifically 2021).

None of this is representative of spending power, of course.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

The original Episode 1 Racer launched back in 1999 for $49.99, which you could play it on your $299 PSX.

Or, inflation adjusted, you bought a $100 game to play on your $650 console.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bud, this isn't up for debate. They charge what they charge. You can refuse to buy games at that price and you have every right to do so, but your personal decision to not buy games on release does not change their price on release.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments