cross-posted from: https://thelemmy.club/post/57178743

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.

Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:

Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 2 days ago*

That was written in the sky...

Open-Source is literally used as marketing tool for the under dogs until they reach a critical mass of users.

People were fighting on social media, defending the product, suggesting it, "it's open source", people were doing the marketing for them.

No wonder why people feel like they got raped, after all the hard work they have done for them...

But at least they didn't contribute code, did you? Not me, because I am old enough to never use such products, it's a classic rug pull, bait and switch.

Open source doesn't mean it's good, it must be hold by a bunch of strangers in T-shirt, not in full suite...

Corpo in disguise...

  • source
  • [–] 95 points 3 days ago (12 children)

    Pretty much seen it coming when the new CEO came in and removed the words "Transparency" and "Always Free" from the official marketing.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Whether you believe it or not is another matter, but this very post still includes the words "transparency" and "always free".

    Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency

    Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

    and a bonus:

    The free plan is here to stay permanently

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 31 points 3 days ago

    Goddamnit, enshittification comes for ALL paid services eventually. Looks like I have another service to start self hosting..

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    It's still open source

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 days ago

    Bitwarden's front-end (Apps, Extensions) must be hard forked before it is too late.

  • source
  • [–] 148 points 4 days ago (23 children)

    I really don’t want to have to switch password managers again.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 days ago (13 children)

    Don't even know where i'd switch.

    Proton -> I already use Proton suite and I like the seperation, the 2 password option doesn't work for me either. I just need a seperate password.

    Keepass -> I use quite a few devices and the sync just seems like a nightmare...

    Any other options? For now i'll stick as BW is still great but will start exploring others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    It just blows my mind how so many comments use the term 'purchase' as if this new enshitification step still allowed for the dictionary meaning of the word.

    I used to suggest bitwarden to everyone, now it's basically 'start using KeePass, keep a copy of your db in a USB drive in your safe, have fun'.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 days ago

    The fact that bitwarden raised 100 millions from venture capitalists for "acceleration" and small changes towards a closed license for premium features is a steady step towards enshittification.

    The writing is on the wall and every announcement like that is a step further into enshittification to provide value for shareholders at the expense of thrle consumer base.

    I still haven't switched yet because life is going fast and I didn't come around to do my backup file server yet, but I would suggest anyone reading this to look for an alternative because it will get worst.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Does this mean I will, or won't be able to install the FOSS version through GitHub? Trying to stop repackagers from selling your project is one thing, but killing the source available installs would be another.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 3 days ago (21 children)

    If you are on Lemmy, theres very high probability that you also have the technical abilities required to self host Vaultwarden and stop relying on a greedy company for your most critical aspect.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 days ago (11 children)

    I could but I don't want. Self hosting something this important? I can't login to any website without this software, including my email. It's super critical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago* (8 children)

    The vault gets synced to your devices. So even if your Backend goes down you dont lose access to your passwords in an instant

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 72 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    That's quite the disappointment. Probably need to prepare to switch away from bitwarden or at least research options for open source clients for my vaultwarden backend.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    Someone can correct me, but this change seems to be targeting people who are repackaging bitwarden and selling it. It does feel like we are trending the wrong direction though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    If you read their announcement carefully you'll find things like

    All current features are available in both versions
    

    Which strongly implies that the different versions will start to diverge over time. Then at one point they will just be like maah it's not worth putting more work into the open source thing, we'll focus on building new cool features yada yada yada. And this is how all the open to partly open to closed source rug pulls worked in the last years.

    (If you want to do this the worst way possible like MinIO you also squash / delete the Git history the moment you announce you're only working on closed source)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 days ago

    Rest in Peace :(

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    "bitwarden apps will be the commercially licensed builds." I don't understand how this is going to change anything.

    I self-host vaultwarden. I use the official Bitwarden app, it works swimmingly. Going the self-hosted route you get enterprise features (I don't use em).

    Doesn't the licensing stuff connect with the backend not the app?

    https://hub.docker.com/r/vaultwarden/server

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago*

    All current features are available in both versions

    They will start making changes exclusively to the propriety app, and eventually the proprietary app will be completely incompatible with the FOSS app. They're doing what Google did with AOSP.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    Interesting thread I stumbled upon from a few years ago where everyone is praising Bitwarden as essential. Times sure do change.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Sigh... I hope this isn't the first move of enshitifying bitwarden. I read the comments/replies and hope this is benign but I'm now nervous

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 days ago
    [–] 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Fantastic. I'm tired of having to change password managers. DashLane, Keepass, LastPass, etc., they all end up shooting their own foot somehow.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›