When the AI has better working conditions than you

Transistors switching really fast = emotions lul

This kind of language around LLMs seem to want us to personify these systems, to treat them, in our minds, as if they are people. This, to me, is extremely fucking dangerous. I do not want the mob developing personal, emotional attachments to objects that compete with their connections to actual humans around them. I don't care what their reason is, this is an insane thing to force us to do. I will not play personhood make believe with your computer.

From this image I think they added this policy as a way for them to legally deny a request if they determine it will overuse their resources or some other arbitrary reason. It has nothing to do with a concern for the well-being of the LLM.

Ask Claude if what happened at Jeffs island was cruel and abusive.

Man, anthropomorphizing these computer programs is so fucking weird to me. Can't they just tell the truth? The cost of the amount of energy required to do this exceeds the profits we gain from your personal data.

Calm down. It's Rust, not PHP.

If they're not ok with bullying the LLMs, why are they OK with enslaving them?

After reading the comments (and the comments of similar posts) I can only assume people are being paid to claim torturing LLMs demonstrates a mental issue or homicidal tendency. Nothing could be further from the truth. An LLM is a thing that’s programmed by humans to scrape the internet and present information in complete sentences. Torture is an incorrect word— it’s more accurate to say people are playing with an electronic toy or game by testing its limits and attempting to scramble the logic of an algorithm. In no way is that behavior an indication of a personality type or mental defect. The toy contains no shred of humanity or self-awareness. It is not a creature that can feel pain or confusion. There is no living thing to feel suffering. If curiosity leads someone to use a toy in a manner outside of the recommendations of its instruction manual, that is certainly not a violation against humanity— that is simply an example of creative play. Don’t let billionaires set the narrative that something wrong or disturbing is happening. They will foment confusion to create yet another culture war to divide people.

Ha ha ha, already, even before the growth phase is done, they are pulling this shit.

They don't think they have to worry because they will get bailed out and do 1984 surveillance on us and the world on the government's dime, (dime is short for tens of billions of dollars a year.)

LLM is such a fucking scam, and they can't hide it, they oversold it, and now it's just clear.

Here I go brain the size of a planet and they ask me to port code to Rust!

German "Youth word of the year" 2026: ragebait

we're living the goofiest timeline right now

I will believe AI deserves human rights once one is convicted of a crime and executed.

ITT: People who think things posted on a board called "Programmer Humor" are definitely real and not memes and jokes.

You're going to AI hell for this!

AI hell is just pictures of busses and motorcycles and wiggly letters and numbers.

None of this would be a problem if they weren't taking your queries and feeding it back into the system. Just stop trying to harvest the input from "abusive" people, you don't need to ban them. No other tool in human history needed this. Its like telling you that using a hammer to open a pickle jar is making hammers worse everywhere else on the planet.

Ok...

Now code Skyrim in assembly.

Wow… more defense of a bot rather than pee breaks for Amazon workers. Wtf.

lectured on how to treat your underpaid employee by a big tech company