So like action-martial-arts movies I would say are universally better when they have fewer cuts because that means they're leveraging the abilities of the actors. Classic example is the ~4 minute single cut from The Protector.

That genre rarely wins Oscars. But I think we can still draw the conclusion that cut frequency's effect on film enjoyment depends on genre.

That's a great little movie, fun for the whole family without being cloying or silly.

No, I retract that, because it's silly in the best way.

Magical cars, super intelligent monkeys, anti-gravity race tracks, and a 16 year old girl with a helicopter parked in the garage.