top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)

There is literally no constitutional or legal provision for a president to declare martial law.

All a president has is the Insurrection Act, and I would be shocked if it were not struck down almost immediately if invoked because people were actively voting or an election was lost.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (5 children)

    You’re being downvoted, but I have a hard time believing that republicans will allow this. It would be catastrophically bad for their party and when it’s time for Trump to be gone, they will turn on him faster than a motor shaft.

    You’re telling me that the “We the People” crowd is going to ok with martial law? The thing that conservatives have been fear mongering since Obama?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I have a hard time believing that republicans will allow this.

    I don’t.

    You’re telling me that the “We the People” crowd is going to ok with martial law?

    Do you remember January 6th? If they were going to turn against Trump, that would have been the time. Republicans love the idea of martial law being used against protestors and racial minorities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    They've been fine with everything else he's done up til now. He literally launched an insurrection last time he lost and was still allowed back into power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Do you also believe Trump will be president in 2029? I personally believe Republicans only use Trump to remain in power. Once he’s no longer useful to them, they will drop his ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Do you also believe Trump will be president in 2029?

    I wouldn't rule it out. He will remain useful until he's gone for good. They've backed his every move so far and plenty of it was worth standing up to, but they didn't. There's no reason to think they'll start being decent people now. They're all too busy grifting his moronic base.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    He's not on the ballot you fucking nincompoops.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago

    To those that didn't see that coming, I'm sorry. To those that did, I know you have the supplies to ride the storm, and I'll see you on the other end of this. Hopefully it's over reasonably soon and we can rebuild better.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    And this at a time where neither Congress nor the Supreme Court seem willing to provide checks and balances on the executive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    If they declare martial law I think we should all go outside and violate it in overwhelming numbers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    Better just do a general strike, if everyone (not realistic but a good chunk) stopped doing their thing it'd make those in charge get it. I don't meant the Trump administration, whoever is really in charge and giving orders. Like anyone in the administration besides heritage foundation and project 2025 writer (to be fair not sole author) Russel Vought, he may have some real pull for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Been promoting the idea of exercising 1st and 2nd amendments to build villages and be harder to oppress.

    People have been wholly uninterested. I have no idea what people expect to do when the gestapo comes for them, but now I'm just looking out for myself. This country is fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Feds are already crawling all over the place, no more free press, supreme court is pocketed, congress has fucked off.

    What would martial law do? Make a cerfuw or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Second amendment cucks are so hard rn

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Those allies should be put on The List for arrest, investigation and imprisonment.

  • source
  • [–] 105 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    If they truly care about voter fraud, they should override Trump and ensure external election observers are present at all polling stations and throughout the counting.

    If they truly want martial law until the election is confirmed, to ensure the election wasn't 'rigged', they should invite a UN peace keeping force to administer it.

    But, somehow, I suspect their motivations aren't based on any concern for legality, justice or democracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago

    This is Steve Bannon calling for it. He's a true fascist through and through. He's also a criminal

    Of everyone in this administration, he is most likely to go to prison after Trump's term. He deserves it, and he's an easy target for the admin to scapegoat for everything

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 41 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

    It's become a meme to ask Americans at what point they will use their supposed 2nd amendment rights to start shooting at magas. And it has become similarly a bit of a meme to laugh at the ignorant non-americans for suggesting it.

    But let's be real. When the magas are threatening to abolish your democracy, you yanks need to make a counter-threat of violence to keep it. It doesn't even need to be "serious". That drunk "we have guns too" lady is actually a fantastic start. But it needs to be followed up by more senior Democrats and I'm not talking about chuck schumer, just someone above "drunk candidate in Fayette county". Someone needs to say that if the Republicans enact martial law there will be blood. Say it jokingly. Say it in wacky wink wink way. But fucking say it. Get your wackiest weirdo politician to actually put the gun on the table.

    If you don't, then at some point it becomes a matter whether you actually care about your democracy. Like, fuck, maybe you don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    This whole thing smells like a long running plot leading to a coup. A whole bunch of rich conservative men are seeking to overthrow the US constitution and take the reigns themselves via proxies. All this is supported by Russia and China and anyone else that wants a bigger share of the world for themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 days ago
    [–] 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    It’s very telling they they say if “he” loses the midterms. HE is not running. But they all know what it means. If THEY lose, he’s either being put IN a prison or UNDER one.

    Fingers crossed it’s the latter.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 days ago

    His first term was much like this one. Not quite as bold in the corruption category but still similar. Biden had four years to do something, anything, about it and decided not to. Despite the fact they obviously should, they're not putting Trump in prison this time either.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    And since that's absolute bullshit, we can expect our police and maybe even the military to step up and do the right thing, yeah? They'll be on our side, right???

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Trump isn’t running in the midterms; he’s supposed to not have a horse in the race.

    Congress though? THEY could lose the midterms. Congess isn’t supposed to be a bunch of presidential yes men. Trump isn’t supposed to be the party leader.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    These people are literally American Nazis.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›