all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 21 minutes ago

Could we get the message across without the kink-shaming?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 hours ago (10 children)

    Okay but have you considered I don't care how I get my job done as long as the paycheck keeps coming.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 hours ago (9 children)

    Okay but have you considered the brain is a muscle that needs exercise to stay healthy and functional and offloading "thinking" makes your brain weaker?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    This is something I’m currently struggling with at a new job. The product they’ve crafted is fundamentally linked to AI, insomuch as I literally can’t get the data without prompting.

    I’m doing my best to “do difficult things” outside of work to compensate, and I can only hope that’s enough

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 44 minutes ago

    The brain is a muscle... really? I wonder where you heard that. Probably a person. Maybe you should fact check that with AI next time.

    Noone says that asking a person a question is offloading their thinking. But if you ask AI it is? How does that work?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 hour ago* (2 children)

    Of course, that's why I sum my spreadsheets by hand with pen and paper and then enter the total back into the sheet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Hehe, Guzzetta.

    ("guz" in my language is "butt cheek", "guza" is "butt")

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 hours ago
    [+] -11 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

    You brainstorm with the robot. Like you brainstorm with a rubber duck.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

    The rubber duck doesn't feed back anything that might affect how you think. It's more like brainstorming with someone who is both sycophantic and has their own (unthought-though) ideas about how you should do it. At best it's a waste of tokens because a rubber duck would have worked, at worst it directs your thought process rather than letting you think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Are you so easily manipulated or why do you think that is always the case?

    Everything has the potential of influencing how you think, it is on you how you let that affect you.

    LMs also work for that. If there is somebody who just accepts everything the software puts out, that is a problem with the person.

    Critical thinking should always be applied no matter where information comes from. But I guess critical thinking is on the downtrend, measured by the amount of people spinning up one scenario in their head, arguing based on just that while ignoring every other possible conclusions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 42 minutes ago (1 child)

    So when I brainstorm with a person, they are never confidently wrong? And they never have their own ideas on how I should do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment