top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago) (2 children)

Do people here, on Lemmy of all places, still not worry about Valve being a monopoly?

It worries me, deeply. Especially with how the community already makes up excuses for them doing anticompetitive things.

There is only one way that ends.

I can’t think of a single example of a “happy sustainable monopoly” in history, but at best they must be vanishingly rare.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 23 minutes ago (1 child)

    As far as I'm aware only gog really "competes" with them the other platforms are worse by a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 minutes ago*

    …This is exactly what I am talking about.

    Why do people pivot to whataboutisms?

    Valve is an effective monopoly. There is no talking around that.

    They have made many straight-up anticompetitive moves, to cement that. The biggest example in my mind is the “other storefront pricing policy,” but there have been several over the years.

    What other companies are doing is irrelevant to that point, unfortunately, as they don’t have enough market share to compete. It does not excuse Valve or make the situation any less worrying to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    I remain baffled at how few studios sell their games directly on their own site.

    The practical barriers are virtually nonexistent, so I’m assuming there’s some form of capitalist fuckery going on behind the scenes that makes it financially unviable?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 50 minutes ago* (1 child)

    there’s some form of capitalist fuckery going on behind the scenes that makes it financially unviable?

    Uhh. It’s that Steam is an effective monopoly?

    They hold all the attention, all the recommendations, so if you aren’t on Steam you are practically invisible.

    There are a few major games that only self publish. Starsector is one, of the top of my head. Hence it is practically invisible to most.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago

    santa, gaben has been good this year, give him another boat

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 47 points 16 hours ago

    100% hard agree. Not launching an IPO is the single best thing Gaben has ever done. Letting in corporate executives would utterly destroy Valve and run them into the ground to fund their golden parachutes. It's happened time and again. Professional "executives" do not run companies for the benefit of the customer they run them into the ground to make themselves richer. Kudos to Gaben for being intelligent enough to recognize this and keep Valve private.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

    Well that's because pretty much all of the competition are terrible.

    There hasn't really been much innovation in digital market space since the concept arose. Valve started it and a few other companies over the years of tried, including Microsoft and all have failed.

    I think valve succeeded because they weren't trying to make a digital market place, it started out as just a distribution platform so not every decision was about how to make the most money out of the customer. You make the money on the games, not the platform and then you build up from there.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah really is down to the only platform that isn't repeatedly shooting itself in the foot is GoG and their no DRM policy has a lot of major publishers saying no deal.

    In all other cases it's less what Valve does right, and more what everyone around them is doing wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 16 hours ago

    Gabe's strategy is public information at this point. He's gone on record several times with the information.

    The focus is on what gamers want first. Reduce barriers to entry. Simplify the process. That naturally attracts customers and the money making happens as a result.

    Every single other company has this reversed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    Probably not. Even MS couldn't do it and they owned the platform. Now Valve push Linux. No other store really runs on that, and certainly not in a way that lets you run games written for Windows.

    Epic are closest to being a competitor, and they're still just a free games platform that will only run until the Fortnite money stops coming in.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 36 minutes ago*

    One of my favorite quotes about Epic (it may have been Tim Sweeney) was something like "people would rather pay for a game on Steam than get it for free on the Epic Store" and it's true. Hell even games I've got for free on Epic I've still purchased (probably on sale) on Steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago

    Epic are closest to being a competitor, and they’re still just a free games platform that will only run until the Fortnite money stops coming in.

    Appreciate the reminder to play the games I need to on that platform

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 21 hours ago*

    Have they tried making a better product?

    Or scratch that. Have they tried making a product that is as good?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›