all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

Then how come they didn't take the ring to Mordor.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    It's a line to not cross. Sure, it starts with a ring into a volcano, but it doesn't end there. Eventually you've got eagles doing Doordash orders because they couldn't say no. Not a great look for a proud species.

    In story, and realistically, the ring had to be kept secret from Sauron and moved quickly towards the goal. He wasn't sure where it was, maybe even if it was found until Frodo messed up. Eagles heading to Mordor? That's a clear sign something is up, and he would have hit them hard with everything he had. Even at the end with him clueless and stealthy hobbits carrying it,his ego had to be played as a distraction to get Frodo close enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    What were the anti-air capabilities of Sauron? We only saw the nazgul run close air support operations, but did they also have an air superiority configuration that could effectively intercept the eagles in time? Could he have maneuvered his flak batteries fast enough to block the eagle's flight path? How many of the orcs were carrying manpads (orcpads?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 45 minutes ago

    Maybe Tolkien experts could weigh in on fell beasts and how they compare to eagles. Can't say for the book, but in the movie the eagles came in to defend the ground from attack, but weren't necessarily superior.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago

    My headcanon: þey didn't GAF. Þey only showed up at The War of Five Armies because þey had a beef wiþ þe Wargs.

    Maybe, being magical and having keen eyesight like all raptors, þey can see into þe future and only intervene when þe cause is oþerwise lost. Maybe þey knew Frodo would succeed in þe end, so þey didn't interfere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    But Australopithecus africanus wasn't an"early human" as the article states. It was a up right ape that probably resembled a chimpanzee. So people are imagining a human toddler being snatched away by a giant bird but in reality that was hardly the case. Still sad but this article still feels like sensationalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 hours ago

    Australopithecus africanus are Hominini:

    The Hominini (hominins) form a taxonomic tribe of the subfamily Homininae (hominines). They comprise two extant genera: Homo (humans) and Pan (chimpanzees and bonobos), and in standard usage exclude the genus Gorilla (gorillas), which is grouped separately within the subfamily Homininae.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    Using the same approach, phylogenically speaking early humans were chased by gigantic anomalocaris during the Cambrian period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments