this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
272 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

15293 readers
3122 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] essell@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wow.

It's zero degrees here in June.

Weird.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

How did you hear negative chirps?

Can I learn this power?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 57 minutes ago
[–] psud@aussie.zone -1 points 4 hours ago

Using the metric version you can get zero with no chirps. The method doesn't work at all for the current temperature though, you can't get -1°C any way

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like parentheses don't belong in explaining math if they aren't used appropriately.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

30 chirps + (added to) 40 = 70

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 42 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming one spherical cricket in a vacuum

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You can't hear a cricket chirp in a vacuum.

The motor is too loud.

[–] sevon@lemmy.kde.social 64 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Pazuzu@midwest.social 14 points 6 hours ago

metric is great until you need to do anything practical with it like converting cricket chirps to degrees ^/s^

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 31 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

...or count the chirps in 8 seconds and add 4.

Why am I taking 25seconds and dividing by 3? Accuracy?

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 28 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My guess would be better approximation as you avoid a "fluke", as 8 second is a very short time where nothing could easily happen even with crickets being present

[–] yimby@lemmy.ca 14 points 13 hours ago

I'm just bothered they chose divide by 3, instead of 16 seconds divide by 2 which is wayyy easier

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago

If you count only for 8 seconds, it will be inaccurate, you need to count for 8 and 1/3 seconds!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Glad to know it's America and crickets that find fahrenheit more convenient for temperature.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think that's how we got fahrenheit.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Actually it was originally based on the freezing temperature of a brine and human body temperature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Really it was "find something that is different to the reseller scales"

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

It was actually based on an existing scale called the Rømer scale

[–] appelkooskonfyt@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

No I'm pretty sure it was crickets.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, so 32° is when an unknown concentration of human brine freezes, and 98.6° is the average human temperature

What am I even reading any more

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I think the brine probably froze at 0° F, which ended up correlating to 32° F for regular water. And the body temperature at 100° F ended up correlating to 212° F for water to boil. That's the way I understand it anyway.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 31 minutes ago

What the hell was the brine that it required it to be 32° below the freezing point of water? Even salt water would have frozen by that point.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Fahrenheit temperature scale, scale based on 32° for the freezing point of water and 212° for the boiling point of water, the interval between the two being divided into 180 equal parts. The 18th-century physicist Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit originally took as the zero of his scale the temperature of an equal ice-salt mixture and selected the values of 30° and 90° for the freezing point of water and normal body temperature, respectively; these later were revised to 32° and 96°, but the final scale required an adjustment to 98.6° for the latter value.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

How do you count just one cricket's chirps? There are usually tons of them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 30 minutes ago

Everyone counts their own crickets and then you add the results together.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Count faster.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I guess Summer's over, it's 4 degrees celsius where I currently am.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How did you count negative chirps?

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Negative occurrences are imaginary numbers, and reading about crickets caused me to imagine hearing them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 29 minutes ago

How many crickets did you imagine? I want to make sure the maths works out.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 2 points 4 hours ago

...I will accept this explanation.

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I was expecting some kind of Duckworth-Lewis formula.