this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

47673 readers
2711 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has said that Palestinians have “no alternative” but to leave Gaza due to the devastation left by Israel’s war on Hamas, in effect endorsing ethnic cleansing of the territory over the opposition of Palestinians and the neighbouring countries.

Speaking as he prepared to host Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Tuesday, Trump repeated the suggestion that Gaza’s population should be relocated to Jordan and Egypt – something both countries have firmly rejected.

Trump claimed Palestinians would “love to leave Gaza”, telling reporters: “I would think that they would be thrilled.”

MBFC
Archive

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I’m calling it, this era will be worse than the bush era when it comes to American atrocities.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Accelerationism has made things worse for everyone. Now we have a US president who has declared his intention to ethnically cleanse the Gaza Strip of Palestinians. If you want things to get better then you have to act in a way that is useful to that end. That means voting for parties that are to the left of fascists and that have a chance of winning. In the US, that's the Democrats.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, I'm sure this would all be very sad for Palestinians but the important thing is that Genocide Joe learned his lesson.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is completely fucking shocking. I hope all the Uncommitted folks are proud of themselves.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Notice how all those bot accounts that were so active leading up to the election have completely vanished from the internet now? Yeah.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago

The difference in the PoliticalCompassMeme subreddit is night and day. One of the few places you can still bully fascists without getting banned.

[–] cass80@programming.dev -1 points 4 months ago

They're still a few on .ml claiming Gaza/Palestinians are better under trump. Absolutely nothing will convince them otherwise

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

EtHnIc ClEaNsInG iS bEtTeR tHaN gEnOcIdE.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's different. Not "better".

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

It is not different. They used genocide to ethnically cleanse Palestine.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’m sorry, but were the democrats stopping the thing?

Stop framing this like this is on the people who didn’t want the genocide to happen. It’s such a weird victory lap I see people here taking. Without fail.

News: something horrible has happened in Gaza.

a bunch of people on lemmy: I was so right.

You’re reading news about people being ethnically cleansed and you’re patting yourselves on the back. What in the fuck.

The establishment US and the ownership class are all-in on this genocide. We are exactly where we would’ve been if Kamala had won. They all support Israel. The democrats just had to do some surface level finger wagging because they knew they were relying on the votes of a bunch of people who see how genocide for what it is. They were lying to you and you’re acting like Israel and the Palestinians aren’t on the same exact path they would’ve been had Kamala won.

You all are sick for taking these horrible stories as some kind of victory. The ownership class is pitting you against republicans, and you against the people who didnt vote exactly like you did in an election. And why was that? Because the people you voted for were enabling a fucking genocide.

As was said elsewhere, history won’t be kind to Biden, trump, Kamala, and Netanyahu. But it won’t be kind to the people who were looking the other way to vote for the enablers.

We were handed a shit sandwich. We all had zero good choices. So some people decided they couldn’t bring themselves to vote for enablers of genocide. That isn’t an incorrect decision. Stop fighting the people who—I mean, I’m assuming(?) you don’t support the genocide…—want to see the genocide end. Because what could you possibly be getting out of that but all these back pats you’re giving yourself?

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Choice was the status quo and pushing towards a solution or palestines almost immediate erasure to violent cheers. Nothing to do with being 'right', about hoping yous aren't completely cooked and see sense. Just as far gone as MAGA unfortunately.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“My candidate was the right choice and you’re wrong. You’re basically maga.”

You have to see how insane that is.

I’m not saying trump isn’t worse. I’m saying if you people cared about the genocide, you wouldn’t be trying to throw anti-genocide people under the bus. You just wouldn’t. You would be working with them toward a solution.

The other powerless people aren’t your enemy. The ownership class that is committing and profiting off this genocide is. But you all are taking aim at the underclass because it gives you a high horse to ride.

That is wrong. That’s my point. But you all just doubled down in the face of that sentiment.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

Whatever you have to tell yourself I guess, right?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh fuck off. Kamala wouldn't have been cheering for ethnic cleansing.

If you have two choices and one is less bad, you choose the less bad one.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah, she would have just continued to do it quietly, just like Biden did. You people are fucking monsters man. Absolutely no sympathy for the Palestinian people.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Ask a Palestinian how they feel about your sympathy

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Hey at least the genocide will be over! Trump is so much better than Kamala on this!

[–] clgoh@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

I'm sure the Palestinians are grateful the Democrats didn't win.

[–] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they started the war and they lost? why should israel make the concession?

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not murdering them all isn't a concession. They can't go live in Egypt. Egypt has 3x the population density of the US now they won't accept gazans

[–] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago
  1. Genocide refers to the deliberate destruction of a group based on its identity, as defined by Raphael Lemkin, who introduced the term after witnessing the horrors of Nazi atrocities. The term was legally recognized in 1946 by the United Nations. Genocide includes actions such as killing, causing harm, and inflicting conditions that destroy a group. Israel’s military actions in Gaza are not aimed at destroying the Palestinian population but targeting Hamas, a terrorist organization. Statements from Israeli officials and military practices reinforce that Israel does not intend to harm innocent civilians in Gaza.

  2. Israel’s military response in Gaza is aimed at Hamas, not the Palestinian population, which is not genocide but a defense against a terrorist group that seeks Israel’s destruction. Hamas's actions represent genocidal intent, targeting Israeli civilians and propagating hatred against Jews. Israel's actions are consistent with international law, focusing on eliminating Hamas and its military infrastructure in Gaza. The use of significant military force is justified, given Hamas’s attacks on Israel. These actions are not genocide, as they are in direct response to a genocidal attack by Hamas.

  3. Israel’s military efforts are designed to minimize harm to Palestinian civilians, with the IDF issuing warnings before strikes and setting up humanitarian corridors. Despite challenges, Israel’s focus is on protecting civilians by evacuating them from battle zones and providing aid. The actions reflect Israel’s desire to protect civilians from harm while addressing the threat posed by Hamas. Claims of genocidal intent are contradicted by Israel's humanitarian efforts in Gaza. The goal is to remove civilians from harm's way while dismantling Hamas's infrastructure.

  4. Hamas deliberately places Palestinian civilians in harm’s way to use them as human shields and to manipulate public opinion by inflating civilian casualties. It fires missiles from civilian areas, turning them into legitimate military targets. While Israel aims to avoid civilian harm, it cannot entirely eliminate the risk due to Hamas's tactics. The responsibility for civilian casualties lies with Hamas, which exacerbates the situation by using civilian sites to shield its operations. Israel’s military actions, while tragic, are legally justified in targeting legitimate military objectives.

  5. Claims of genocide by Israel in Gaza are based on misunderstandings and unverified information. The true circumstances surrounding civilian casualties are unclear due to Hamas's control of Gaza's health ministry and its influence on casualty reporting. The real causes of civilian deaths, including whether they were caused by Hamas’s actions or Israeli strikes, are often unclear. Claims of genocide are fueled by misinformation, and the real blame for civilian suffering should lie with Hamas. Efforts to end the suffering in Gaza would be better focused on defeating Hamas, ensuring peace for both Palestinians and Israelis.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

History will not be kind to either Netanyahu, or the Biden/Trump presidencies.

This will mean fuck all the to Palestinians who became “displaced persons” just so the Israeli’s can have their own Lebensraum.

The rest of the world needs to get off its ass and ensure Gaza is rebuilt on Israel’s shekel for the Palestinians like a modern day Marshall plan. And ideally prosecute a couple of people for actively advancing genocide.

[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The rest of the world needs to get off its ass and ensure Gaza is rebuilt on Israel’s shekel for the Palestinians like a modern day Marshall plan. And ideally prosecute a couple of people for actively advancing genocide.

Except remember, those are America's shekels being spent.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Well, they keep vetoing things that would help. Like calling it a genocide…

[–] frogger@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This will mean fuck all the to Palestinians who became “displaced persons” just so the Israeli’s can have their own Lebensraum.

Does Lebensraum mean to have the safety of not to get attacked by your neighbors? I'm not justifying this plan but to say that was Israel wanted this all along when they disengaged in 2005 and didn't start the war is a bit out there

[–] alexc@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

An awful lot can change in twenty years.