How many people go days without drinking tap water?
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
54 points (90.9% liked)
No Stupid Questions
41851 readers
653 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A function economy 😂. Jk
But being realistic to your answer, it’s possible to be done, but everyone involved would have to be in on it, assuming you wanna get away with it. The US has extremely strict and aware water safety protocols. It would take just 1 whistleblower to takedown this operation.
The US has extremely strict and aware water safety protocols. It would take just 1 whistleblower to [take down] this operation.
Had. HAD. The US has fired many/most of its inspectors.
75% of American drinking water requires treatment for one thing or another. One of those treatments is supplied by a single vendor out of a single plant in a flood-prone area. Apparently only recently did it receive federal staffing to improve security. This is only one of the many weak links in a supply chain with now absolutely zero oversight.
I wish I was kidding.
Trump gonna Trump 🙃
The next president is absolutely f*****
Orr just someone having one those water treatment facilities running Windows XP and increasing the chlorine content. Has happened before.
Nope.
It already happens. Look at things like pipeline leaks poisoning the water supply for certain native groups. There's obviously protests against such projects that will inevitably lead to said poisoning, people get arrested for protesting, and then they do the project anyways.
Racial / cultural supremacists wouldn't want to kill anyone of their preferred (usually their own) group, and certainly not a significant number of them. They'd basically have to gerrymander the water supply to arrange things so that only those they want to be poisoned actually get poisoned.
That's 1) expensive and 2) someone's going to notice.
It would be far easier, and cheaper to go full genocide and start shooting.
In one case, active in the world right now, the "undesirables" live in one area, and rather than poison the water, the supremacists have simply cut it off. They've also implemented the "start shooting" strategy.
I wish them all a crippling attack of conscience, and if not that, the inability to distinguish who they want to shoot from who they don't want to shoot.
Lots of people drink bottled water, soda, beer, or other drinks not immediately connected to the water supply. Furthermore, poisons are unlikely to remain undetected long enough to kill the entire population. While a strong dose of a deadly poison like cyanide can kill in minutes it’s likely to be detected quickly due to how rapidly its effects begin to show up.
A slower-acting, accumulating poison like dimethylmercury could potentially kill more people because its effects don’t show up immediately. On the other hand, the delayed effects of the poison would provide the victims a chance to retaliate against the poisoners.
Either way, it’s a very crude and unfocused attack against a population which is unlikely to achieve any political aim besides wanton destruction and outrage.
No.
But...
The adage that "the dose makes the poison" is working in your favor here. A large city supply delivers millions of liters of water per day; by the time you dilute your poison into millions of liters of water you'll either be adding absurd amounts of poison (someone is going to notice massive line of tanker trucks queued up outside the treatment plant), or you are dealing with large - but not unweildly - volumes of something so horrendously toxic that it's still deadly when diluted that much. There are very few substances that toxic, and someone is going to notice if you start procuring hundreds of liters of botulism toxin or Vx because at that point you are dealing with outlawed chemical warfare agents
Not only that, the water supply is linear, so to keep the water dangerous, you gotta keep adding the substance.
Just worth pointing out, changing water source in Flint Michigan and not adding corrosion inhibitors seemed to do an excellent job for a short period.
Oh yeah, that is the other way of poisoning a water supply, sabotage it so that it keeps poisoning itself
See also the Camelford disaster
Unsure why you're getting downvoted (this is "No Stupid Questions", after all), but I'll give my 5 cents:
Reason 1:
The people is essentially the reason why a government has power. Without the people (and their support), the government governs a whole lot of nothing, and they will be forced to do labour themselves.
Reason 2:
Poisoning the water is not very accurate, and may lead to both the death of many whom already are supportive of the government (which will create distrust), and people only getting sick depending on the amount they drink (the dose makes the poison).
Reason 3:
Despite a population having a lot of dissidents, these people still work and contribute to society in some ways. It has to get pretty bad before it will be "worth it" to remove them from society.
Reason 4:
Even if it's so bad that you're looking at an open revolt against the government, poisoning the water will only really yield MAD, which is usually undesirable.
Ultimately, it's unlikely desirable for any government to do this, as there are better ways (for the government). However, there have been some attempts at genocide through water supplies before, so it's not completely unheard of. Check out Project Coast.
I dunno, at this point im pretty sure trump could demand the death or every first born and americans would bend over. It is beyond wild that we have not had an armed uprising yet, and i gave up hope that we will ever have one years ago.
Regarding "No Stupid Questions", I submit for your consideration the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyiNW33MpAo
spoiler
stupid questions not allowed
If you live in an open and transparent society: there will be an investigation and there is a high chance they will find out. You'll be expected to take care of the mess with disaster relief for the survivors. Also about 40% of the people did vote for you. Also even the ones who did not vote for you still pays tax.
If you live in a dictatorship: police brutality is cheaper and is a bit more selective in it's targeting.
The chance of them pulling it off with nobody noticing or saying anything is very low, it's not a one person operation. Then depending on the speed of the poison it would become obvious that there's something in the water very quickly and people would stop drinking it.
The international backlash would be pretty severe.
Its called the Geneva Suggestions
Genocide is unlikely as people can stop drinking after finding out it is poisonous, especially if the poison is fast acting. There has been many cases of industrial mining companies poisoning rivers.
River ecocide will probably alert the authorities first. https://www.waternz.org.nz/Story?Action=View&Story_id=2427
It has to be a slow acting poison and not easily detectable or something so new that no one knows about.. yet. Example...PFAS - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC2eSujzrUY
Seems like there has been break-ins though to water supply - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/elisabethbraw_is-russia-trying-to-poison-finlands-water-activity-7251250484294873088-d2YP
How do you feel about fluoride?
I don't know how to feel about it.
On one hand, people should probably be brushing their teeth anyways, so if you brush your teeth and also have flouridated water, seems a bit excessive?
But on the other hand, life is stressful and I'm dealing with depression and I often forget to brush my teeth... so like... idk I don't have enough info to have a strong opinion on it. There's pros and cons to both side of the flouride debate.
There’s only pros. It’s proven to prevent cavities in children and adults, much better than brushing alone.
There’s also the sad fact that not every kid is taught to—or sometimes allowed to—brush their teeth.
I hope there's nothing secretly sinister about it.
I mean, sure, this could endup just being FUD like with the antivax conspiracy theory, but it also has the potential of being another Microplastic polluting shit like PFAS that nobody knew was harmful for many decades.
So for things I have low-info on, its best to not hold a strong opinion, rather than risking beliving in the wrong thing. I keep my mind open to different points of view.
Nothing sinister at all. It has a long and proven track record. Which you can check out if you don’t want to be low-info anymore. Doctors and dentists support it.
But there’s a subset of people who want us to go back to disease-ridden serfs, because when your teeth are falling out and 3 out of your 5 kids died young from disease and you can barely make rent, you’re too distracted to care what other people are doing.