this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
195 points (99.0% liked)

News

28891 readers
3648 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The White House claimed it had not intended to send its revised, and more aggressive, set of demands to Harvard on April 11, according to a report by the New York Times published Friday evening.

Trump administration officials claimed that the demands, which were seen as excessive and illegal to Harvard’s administrators, should not have been sent and were “unauthorized.”

The Friday letter was supposed to clarify the initial list, but instead presented a much more aggressive array of demands that included derecognizing pro-Palestine groups, submitting to three years of federal audits, and agreeing to report international students who broke University conduct policies to federal agencies.

“Even if the letter was a mistake, the actions the government took this week have real-life consequences.”

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is why we say, "Do not comply in advance". I don't buy this explanation for one second. Someone stood up the these MAGA-looneys and they're saying this to save face and try to dodge problems in court.

I don’t buy this explanation for one second.

Why would the demands have even been written up in the first place if they hadn't intended to send them?

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, the article specifically mentioned that Harvard admins saw the demands as excessive and illegal.

Harvard has a lot of clout, and I think it's reasonable to assume that someone very high-up at the school got on the phone with somebody very high-up at WH (if not POTUS himself) and straight up told them a narcissist's least-favorite word: "No."

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

"I didn't want you to do that anyways." crosses arms

Flip Flop 47 is at it again.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They claim it was a mistake ….. so all the retaliatory funding freezes are cancelled, right? RIGHT?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 72 points 2 days ago

that they had the 'revised, and more aggressive, set of demands' already written is telling enough.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 50 points 2 days ago

"Whoops, you weren't meant to see that yet.."

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

This just screams 'I'm sorry mister Tyson, I didn't mean to punch YOU in the face.'

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

The MAGA Nazis are so stupid that they think "Sorry, we're incompetent!" is a valid explanation for their evil.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago

Have not even read the article, but they really are just fucking around and if there is too much pressure they say "whoopsie" to save face, and normalize the atrocities. Doesn't mean they'll stop trying to do the thing.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Fucking maga clowns

[–] greybeard@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

So either incomprehensibly incompetent or unimaginably evil. You can pick one, or acknowledge both.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The place that should be held to the highest standard for employment making intern level of mistake daily is also telling how awful these people are at their jobs. Stuff like this would never be able to happen at a regular job and things like this require multiple people to sign off on to make sure mistakes are not made. If they are making mistakes like this, just imagine the stuff we don't see or hear about... yet.

[–] wickedrando@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

Viewpoint DEI wtf