this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
372 points (95.1% liked)

196

17534 readers
477 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
372
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

great meme format

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 70 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Look, as much as I dislike Rowling's terf bullshit, I haven't heard of any human trafficking allegations involving her.

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 99 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Look, as much as I dislike Tate's misogyny bullshit I haven't heard of trans rights being rolled back due to his involvement in lobbying and funding hate-groups.

Let's just say both of them are horrible human beings.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Of course they're both horrible but then what's the point of this meme? That they're both bad?

"Margaret Thatcher is just Steven Seagal for women"

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 38 points 4 days ago

Both are serving as a pipeline for group-based enmity/bigotry for a specific target group. Tate pulls in sexually frustrated and insecure men and turns them into mysogynists. JKR pulls in middle aged insecure liberal-feminists and introduces them to transphobia.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

Let's just say both of them are horrible human beings.

I certainly agree with that. You make a good point.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

She donates her considerable money to anti trans causes.

Capital at scale is capable of far more damage than any other individual action can be.

A billionaire funding conservative aka cruel causes is being more effectively harmful than literally any serial killer in history, and depending on the cause, in some cases every serial killer in history put together.

A billionaire lobbying to maintain the American Healthcare system, aka our murder for profit confidence scheme industry, has a body count that would make Jackthe Ripper blush.

To be fair to serial killers though, their murders are artisinal and hand crafted, not mass produced.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

She's kept herself to the indirect harm options.

Given what we know about mental health issues for trans folks, there's definitely been some lives lost as a result of her choices, we just can't prove a link.

[–] Master@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

What a crop

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean, how many people is Rowling guilty of human trafficking?

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 56 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ah, the ol' muggle smuggle

[–] essell@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

You deserve a cash reward for this comment

[–] Onionguy@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

I believe this is one of the few situations that would warrant the use of the tear laugh emoji. Have an upvote. xD

[–] AlexLost@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago

Nah, some of Rowlings ideas are fantastical and fun at least. Nothing that cromagnon goon Tate says nor thinks has any worth at all.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

Can we pit them against each other....without a risk of them joining each other like a binary black hole of dumb?