Copenhagen pretty much has this. So easy to get around everywhere.
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1196 points (98.4% liked)
Fuck Cars
12847 readers
859 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've been saying for years "self driving cars are solving the wrong problem". The problem isn't that I have to steer my car. The problem is I need a fucking car to go anywhere worth going.
But then this problem will be solved for those who can't afford it. This is simply not fair to those who are hardworking to earn their salary
/s
Obviously
Obvious enough, but people are crazy and I’ve seen people here with even worse opinions.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I saw a video recently by a car enthusiast who hates the idea of self driving cars for a novel reason.
Even if self-driving cars are safer than people it won’t stop bad owners. People who drive with unsafe mechanical issues they can’t or won’t get fixed are still going to exist, and bald tires and worn brakes would eliminate any potential safety benefits of self driving.
And by further removing people from the operation of a car, you’re making them worse owners. They won’t know what a worn tie rod bushing would feel like because they never steer. Making cars into appliances just makes them less safe.
He also made a point that I agree with: If we get people who don’t want to drive off the road, the roads would be nicer for people who do want to drive.
Back when I used to agree with Mush, he said something I still agree with, "you don't want flying cars, because you don't want a poorly maintained car to fly around and lose a hubcap".
People who drive with unsafe mechanical issues they can’t or won’t get fixed are still going to exist, and bald tires and worn brakes would eliminate any potential safety benefits of self driving.
In European nations we just inspect the shit out of every car to ensure safety. The car must be mechanically satisfactory and have adequate brakes, tyres, etc.
In the US only 19 states have mandatory periodic safety inspections
Also having worked in the industry the "if" in "Even if self-driving cars are safer than people" is carrying the weight of the sun. You might be able to get them safer than humans in a specific subset of circumstances but I would never trust one.
load more comments
(5 replies)
I somewhat disagree with this. If you can feel worn tires, brakes, or suspension bushings, it's easy to imagine the car feeling them and raising a service alert, and locking out if not appropriately serviced.
Vendor lock-in and enshittification, baby.
load more comments
(10 replies)
load more comments
(9 replies)
I'm hearing you want continental Europe
Shame that they don't want me. ;_;
* exceptions may apply
New York City, Washington DC, Boston, MA?
SD, LA, SF, Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, Vancouver
Please.
I’m realizing these cities were founded in colonial times by Europeans
.... yes? not sure what that has to do with high speed rail but you're not wrong.
*western continental Europe
Or even
Wait for it
SELF DRIVING TRANSIT
Which yes is already a thing too
Okay
but what, hear me out now.
What if we just got a bunch of self driving cars.
and we linked them together to increase capacities.
and had them run on a dedicated path
and create special locations where these car links come and go on a regular schedule, so people can get on and off predictably?
It'll be new, neverbefore seen, and revolutionary! /s
"did the tech industry just reinvent the subway again"
And much easier to implement than self driving cars
somebody should do a compilation including data about:
- the costs of public transport against private cars, for the whole city
- the space consumption for parking your private cars in a city compared to the space consumption for all public transport vehicles
and make a statistics and post it here
They have (I've seen them, but don't have a link sorry) and car free or semi car free with good bike and public infrastructure is almost always cheaper and more efficient
Self driving buses though can be very useful!
No labor cost to drive the bus means it suddenly becomes a lot cheaper to operate buses with less capacity. Meaning, more frequent buses in low density neighborhoods.
Lets go a step farther and put that bus on tracks, which will make it even easier and safer to implement self driving.
maybe we can connect multiple busses together and that way it can carry more on the same track!
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(32 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›