this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

2429 readers
239 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not particularly fond of cuck licenses.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That actually does describe the class of licences fairly accurately. Companies specifically love cuck licenses because of their unfree propagation properties.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what's with this language?

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you have a better description? I think "Cuck license" actually covers it very well: You build your bestest robotic waifu, when Intel-sama kicks in the door, and fucks her right in front of you, impregnating her, and then leaving and never coming back, leaving everyone a victim.

Because that's effectively what happened to Andrew Tanenbaum's Minix kernel (which was used by intel to enable the Intel Management chip, which has even more control over your machine than your own CPU). Had Tanenbaum used GPL, intel would've been legally forced to open source the code, enabling us users to see what's actually running inside.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 6 days ago

what the fuck is wrong with you?