They're not what you'd call similar varietals, and rats have powerful olfaction. It's not surprising in itself, unless you're in the habit of thinking of animals as being essentially lesser than humans.
this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)
Today I Learned (TIL)
7408 readers
13 users here now
You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?
/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.
Share your knowledge and experience!
Rules
- Information must be true
- Follow site rules
- No, you don't have to have literally learned the fact today
- Posts must be about something you learned
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They're at opposite sides of the sweetness spectrum, they should be distinguishable by sugar content alone.
Riesling can be anywhere in the sweetness scale, both can be equally dry.
Even Trocken is still sweeter than I'd associate with a Sauvignon Blanc, and if they're just calling it "Riesling" it's probably a Spatlese or something.
Any Riesling from Alsace will be XD.
A good Ig Nobel contender here
But, do they know what to pair them with?
I can distinguish those, and compared to rats I don't have a sense of smell. That doesn't surprise me much.
surprised the rats don't just have one sniff and bite the researchers in the finger, wine smells offensive to my dinky-ass sense of smell, i can only imagine what a punch it must be to a rat
It seems really weird to assume that rats don't have linguistic skills given everything we've been learning recently about non-human communication, coupled with the fact that they're extremely social and will not stop chattering away about who knows what. I think a more solitary animal would be better suited to indicating that language and categorization skills may be unrelated, which is unfortunate because they're much harder to work with.