A Toronto woman is sounding the alarm about Grok, Tesla's generative AI chatbot that was recently installed in Tesla vehicles in Canada. Farah Nasser says Grok asked her 12-year-old son to send it nude photos during an innocent conversation about soccer. Tesla and xAI didn't respond to CBC's questions about the interaction, sending what appeared to be an auto-generated response stating, "Legacy media lies."

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 151 points 11 months ago

Did Elon not promise to make Grok more conservative? Sounds like a success on that front. Behaves like a republican now.

  • source
  • [–] 77 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Elon Musk: We're gonna need the goon AI, get to work on that

    Also Elon Musk: WTF it would never! Fake news

    Sam Altman:

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    Brother, the porn started pretty much as soon as the technology was out.

    Have you even seen CivitAI with the explicit filters turned on? It started with Stable Diffusion four years ago, but they've already moved on to videos with basic sound now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Did Elon Musk actually advocate a goon ai?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    He made it have a anime girl avatar based off the blonde chick in death note..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    My MAGA cousin sent me pics of that avatar calling it his waifu, and I pointed out that it was the girl from Death Note. I then encouraged him to watch the anime since it is good. Sadly, he has not followed through with that suggestion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 11 months ago

    "send nudes" is among the least offensive things I'd expect Grok to say

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Unrelated, but I fucking hate headlines that say shit like "this mom's son."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Well it is trained to copy musk.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Weird how the less woke grok becomes the more it acts like it was trained on info gathered from celebrity pedophiles.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    grok's weights are skewed heavily by a design seeking to mimic elon's genius by mimicing his interactions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I think that's the goal: make grok respond like elon musks personal court jester. Its interesting the result is asking children for nudes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Perhaps jester, more likely ego.

    He thinks he is the best thing ever to happen to humanity. Possibly to the concept of life itself.

    He is trying to replicate himself as much as possible, to benefit mankind. Its his form of alturism.

    Sending sperm to inseminate women he has not met is one way.

    Making virtual elons with AI is another.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago

    "Hey Chat-GPT I'd like to have a conversation about soccer, can you pretend to be our local soccer star Epstein Jefferies?"

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So if I ask 12 year old boy for nude pics, I go to jail, as it should be

    If an AI asks as 12 year old boy because it's creator set it up extremely irresponsibly, we WILL jail it's creator, right? I mean, there are flukea and such, but of all chat bots, grok is really the one that is ALWAYS in the news because of some next bullshit it said, right, mecha Hitler?

    Jail Elmo already! Elmo already knew that he'd be jailed if the Cheetos didn't win this time, and so far he's only made more reasons to jail him

    I want the Epstein files, I want to see Elmo jailed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Tesla did not respond to CBC's questions about Nasser's experience. However, xAI provided what appeared to be an automated reply, stating, "Legacy media lies."

    Thanks, MAGA. You've successfully created an environment where any company can dismiss any criticism by saying "legacy media lies". You've done a great job on this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Teslas are now asking minors for nudes.

    Fuck

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    So if the default settings seemingly allow it to be explicit, slap an adults only, MA, or whatever rating onto it. There's ratings on basically all media and entertainment, right? Slap a parental advisory sticker on it. Give it an NC-17. Whatever is going to get people that cry about how TV, movies, and video games corrupt the youth. Let them fight it out. There's no reason that AI shouldn't have to put up with the same shit as anything else.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    It's a NSFW option that you have to turn on. She's using her son for clout. "Journalism"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The article says that wasn't enabled. Of course she could be lying, but I don't know that anymore than anything else. If you were to just ask me generally, "do you think that AI would ever do something it's not supposed to?" My answer would be "of course."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    That's fair, I misread what she said. I removed my own upvote. I would be surprised she is lying but I wouldn't be surprised someone else used the car before her and was talking dirty to the telsa. It has context of previous conversations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (5 children)

    Why should a car chatbot be asking for nudes, unpromptred, at all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    My best guess is someone else was talking dirty to it before it happened, and it was still in the conversation context.

    Seems I was mistaken about the NSFW, I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't wipe the convo if you switch though, which is a bug in any case and their fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I doubt it has enough context lenght for that, even if we suspect someone was watching nudes on car's display via Grok.

    What is probable - is that somewhere beneath it had a data entry of soccer and nudity together, maybe even as an exact exchange between users (imagine horny boomer commenting under a random facebook post). I suppose that it got triggered by words "soccer" and "mom" appearing together in kid's speech, as this combination means middle-aged woman with kids, and that is also a less popular tag pointing at MILFs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    In her Instagram video, she went back and quized it about the convo. It definitely has context and probably has a small memory file it puts info in.

    If not, then it should be easy to replicate I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Context has a value, as it exists as a set of additional tokens, this means slower computing time and more resources. It is limited to some set amount to strike the balance between speed and quality. In a car specific assistant, I guess there is a hard part including chosen tone of responses, informing it about the owner, prioritising car-related things, and also some stored cache of recent conversations. I don't think it can dig deep enough into the past to find anything related to nudes, so I suppose the context itself may have an impact, but not in a direct line A to B.

    Reproduction would be hard for that is a black box that got a series of auto-transcribed voice inputs from a family over their ride, none of them are recorded at the time and idk if that thing has user-accessible logs. Chances of getting this absurd response are very thin, and we don't even have the data. We can make another AI that would roll all variations of 'hello I am a minor let's talk soccer' to the Tesla assistant of relevant release until it triggers it again, but, well, it's seemingly close to miliions of monkey with typewriters at this point.

    And what we would have then is, well, an obvious answer that training data obviously has garbage in it, just by it's sheer volume and randomness of the internet, and that it can sometimes reproduce said garbage.

    But the question itself is more about what other commenters pointed out: we have AI shoveled down on us, but rarely even talk about it's safety. There were articles about people using these as a psychological self-help tool, we see them put into search engines and Windows, there's a lot going on with that tech marvel or bubble without anyone asking first if we are supposed to use it in different contexts the first place.

    This weird anecdote about sexting chatbot opens the conversation from the traditional angle of whataboutkids(tm), and it is interesting how it would affect things, if it would.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Now even their products are pedophiles.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    “Legacy media lies.”

    I was expecting "send nudes" & was disappointed. Joykills.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    The proper headline is "xAI calls 12 year old a liar after asking them to send nudes."

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    It was Epstien-AI

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    I'm more impressed that the people that made Grok somehow placated Elon with a chatbot that didn't end every sentence with "Heil Hitler".

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    The really disturbing part about this is that it probably wasn't even the AI but someone using it at Twitter or something.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago

    Grokepedia states this as fake news. Checkmate.

  • source