all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 11 months ago (9 children)

In the end, the fight led to more than 500,000 books being removed from the Archive’s “Open Library.”

In case you wanted to know what was lost.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 11 months ago

    I'm kind of amazed that only that and the 78's archive was lost. At least there's Project Gutenberg et al to help with the books, and meanwhile the IA does still archive a vast load of video material, software, and no doubt, other stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    How many of them are not backed up somewhere else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Most of them are still "on" the Internet Archive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Reminds me of a certain emulation site that was hit by Nintendo's lawyers and removed the download links for all of their games.

    Except that's all they did. The files are still there, the game pages are still up, all that's missing is the big shiny download button. A simple userscript can add them back and let you download the "removed" games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 11 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 65 points 11 months ago* (14 children)

    They don’t need to die, they need to go back to what they used to be. The first copyright law was called the Statute of Anne and it covered a work for 14 years.

    That’s a totally reasonable amount of time for an author/publisher to make their money. And it’s reasonable for creators to want to get paid for their work.

    And then it should be public domain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -48 points 11 months ago* (13 children)

    No, they need to die.

    If you can't protect your own ideas, you shouldn't get to rely on the government to do it for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 11 months ago* (10 children)

    How are you proposing that people protect their own ideas?

    Say you write a book. You self-publish. A big publisher CTRL-C/CTRL-Vs your book and publishes it themselves with their access to distribution networks and advertising budgets. Now you sell 0 copies of your book while the publishing house makes millions.

    What should you have done differently?

    Copyright laws were invented to protect creative people against publishing monopolies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

    How is the publisher making money if everyone can copy and redistribute it for free themselves?

    Edit: Loving the downvotes from useful idiots. Keep getting taken for a ride 👍

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You didn’t answer my questions

    To answer yours, beyond what i already laid out in the question itself, the original Night Of The Living Dead has been out of copyright for decades, and yet corporations still make money off it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    How do they make money off of it?

    Do they create their own derivative work and then make money off of that because copyright laws prevent people from copying and redistributing it for free?

    Edit: They didn't have an answer because they know I'm right. They respond with insults rather than admitting they're wrong.

    This is why businesses that profit off of copyright and patent laws make so much profit, because they have no shortage of suckers and saps who don't know any better proud to throw money at them.

    But hey, at least they fit in with each other, right? 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    People can literally do that right now and yet the music, book, etc. industries still exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    People can and will do that Big publishing houses cannot, because of the litigational threat.

    While I don't uncritically support one side or the other, there are provisions for protecting the small and large alike, and I think there's no easy answer.

    Everyone thinks the problem is easy to solve until a specific incidence lands in their lap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Is that Steve Wozniak holding one of those zeroes?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Not unless he became Asian. You can click on the picture in the article to make it full screen. Not Woz.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments