all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Who is designing drugs for cancer? What about drugs for the patients?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    I've watched a documentary called "I am Legend", so i know what happens next.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    A common cancer drug has been restructured to make its cancer cell killing abilities up to 20,000 times more effective while also reducing its toxicity

    far more powerful and targeted—leaving healthy cells unharmed.

    The new drug entered leukemia cells 12.5 times more efficiently, killed them up to 20,000 times more effectively and reduced cancer progression 59-fold. This was all without detectable side effects, according to the researchers.

    It has only been tested in animals thus far, but wow

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I'm just waiting for the next article which says one of the potential side effects is that patients might dissolve into a puddle of goo.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Sure hope it's a drug against cancer.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    There are always a lot of good news. The goods news just don't make 'good news' for the news companies. Nobody wants to read that x metric is slightly better now, disaster was averted, or slight progress was made in world changing new technology. That doesn't sell subscriptions or bait clicks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    So fentanyl for cancer!? RFK better get to stopping this.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    And what's going to happen to the price of that drug?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    What does "it killed cancer cells up to 20000 times more effectively" mean? Genuinely asking because in my mind it's ethier dead or its not. The other stats make some amount of sense to me but I can't figure out what this one is saying.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    You can read the article and the study, but presumably a single dose kills that many more cancer cells.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago

    So I can keep my peanuts?

  • source