as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don't know the reason since i'm not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he's still up for the candidate) supporters. don't know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

We don't take kindly to folks who don't take kindly 'round here.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    There is a conservative comm on lemm.ee

    It's a shit hole though as expected

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Decentralized network designed to stand up to big tech by gay trans furries. Not much appeal for those folks round these parts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (8 children)

    I think a lot of the people on Lemmy came from Reddit when the whole API thing happened. It was pretty much a boycott. I assume most of the people who cared enough about that to leave were mostly left-leaning.

    That's why I'm here, at least.

    Edit: not sure about Mastodon, though

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (7 children)

    Reddit chased away the Trump supporters before the API thing happened. When it did, some people like me who are classic-liberals and libertarians also came over. After all, Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform even when its users aren't. When I express a political opinion objectionable to leftists, I get several times more down-votes than up-votes but I do get up-votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform

    This is an interesting perception, because if you mean American libertarianism then this doesn't really make sense. Lemmy's creators are communist and intended it to be anti-corporate. It is designed in a decentralized manner specifically to avoid situations where companies can own and profit from it.

    The kinds of platforms I would see as being libertarian (in the American sense) are the diaspora of privately owned social media companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Not all libertarian-leaning people are on board with corporatism; IMO freedom is for people, not businesses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    I respect it but if you're American and trying to take the word back, I'm afraid you're a little too late. It's a political party now and they're all-in on corporatism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Almost no one pays attention to the big-L Libertarian party. Ron and Rand Paul got some attention on the national level but they weren't even members of the party (while in office) and the party itself has never been politically relevant.

    I think these days the word is associated more with Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with). These guys favor the free market over government regulation (which isn't really relevant to Reddit) but they're also very sympathetic to free-as-in-speech open-source software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with)

    I hate to break it to you but these are definitely the worst ones. It's what the Gadsden flag waving canned food and gun hording preppers turn into if they end up with tons of money. These are the morons that build bunkers in New Zealand and try to brainstorm ways to keep their post-apocalyptic security guards loyal to them with remote-detonated bomb collars or holding their families hostage.

  • source
  • parent
  • I think this is an example of where the left-right axis isn't the most adequate way of viewing things. The Fediverse in general is anti-authoritarian. You can be all the way from a far-left anarchist to a far-right anarcho-capitalist and still be anti-authoritarian, just like both tankies and nazis are authoritarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    They absolutely exist. But in general, I think most people here are informed and choose a wide variety of information to consume. That is exactly the opposite of most Trump supporters.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I like it this way. It's not an "echo chamber" because we do have some interesting liberal vs leftist discussions. I think I've already heard quite enough conservative nonsense though; they aren't entitled to my consideration forever.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Trump supporters tend to hang out in the /modlog community. Try there first.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They're here, anything pro trump is often downvoted, and most things heavily critical of the Dems are also often downvoted.

    For better or worse, there's not a lot of right wing stuff that makes it into the positive on votes.

    If you sort new, you'll see it pop up from time to time.

    It's hard to tell sometimes, but it certainly feels like some political regimes are trying out dropping propaganda here or there into the conversation. I'm sure most of it is from genuine users, but there are some comments that just look like they're here to stir up dissent.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They are, but defederation helps keep the echo chambers separate.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    There are a couple masquerading as Green Party supporters, and you do see blatently pro-Trump posters occasionally, but most of them are lurkers who, if they comment, hide behind criticizing Democrats rather than voicing pro-Trump sentiments.

    Look for the people who were smashing Biden for the debate behavior while ignoring Trump's Alzheimer's symptoms. The people being nitpicking Harris or Walz, while being silent about the Couch-Fucker and Orange Stalin. Those are the pro-Trump lurkers. There aren't many, though, because they don't thrive outside of an echo chamber.

    Lemmy's an echo chamber as well, but you'll find plenty of people who criticize both parties, and while a lot of people like Kamala, very few claim she's perfect, or worship her. And there's plenty of legitimate criticism of the Democratic party, and strong sentiment about a need for change in US politics. This is the sort of discussion and debate which would not be sanctioned in most conservative forums, and could easily get you banned. So I think it's fair to say Lemmy is far less echo-y than most.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›