Let me guess, he felt threatened by the 95 year old woman.
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
261 points (98.2% liked)
World News
45351 readers
3994 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The 35-year-old officer said "nah, bugger it" before firing the Taser's barbs at her chest
Fucking bullshit, but entirely unsurprising that a cop gets away with a slap on the wrist for something that would put anyone else away behind bars. NSW has never truly moved on from the Rum Corp
“It is … at the lower end of seriousness of crimes amounting to wrongful death,” Harrison said.
Explain to me how electrocuting a frail 95 y/o demented woman to death ranks 'on the lower end' of crimes involving fatalities. Seriously, explain it to me like I'm 3, because I can't believe that this statement was issued by a judge.
Because that's not what he did.
The woman was holding a steak knife and refused to drop it, he shot her with the taser which caused her to fall - as tasers are designed to - but she hit her head and died a week later in the hospital. That's an injury that is always a risk when using tasers against anyone.
Should they be used against 95 year olds with walkers even if they do refuse to drop the knife and continue menacingly inching towards you, that's an entirely different issue.
i dont think it justifies it. a trained cop can easily wrestle a knife from a 95-yr old.
Anyone with a heavy blanket could do it, though the fall and head injury risk might be kinda similar.
They use big mattress things in Japan I think.
Easy for you to say.
pulling the trigger on a taser and killing your granny is also pretty easy apparently
The whole point of a TAZER is it incapacitates without killing, are you seriously suggesting this was intentional?
Remember, it wasn't the shock that killed her, it was the subsequent fall.
So a peice of data for y'all. My Dad was 80+ and pretty frail with alzheimer's. When he had an episode of paranoia, he was alarmingly strong, and suddenly could walk and move like he was 50 again. I've been told this is common and apparently is due to extreme adrenaline. But I observed that it can't last all that long, 40 minutes was the max. I don't think we should count out the 95 year old granny being dangerous. Now knowing that though, I would have attempted to avoid and delay. And really, I would do that no matter who it is. But I don’t know if the cop knows all that or if it was a realistic option. Most of the staff at memory care didn't understand the concept, and this was a higher end facility.
Oh, and what the heck is the facility doing with steak knives? Unless "nursing home" means something different in Australia, the whole situation shouldn't have occured. One judge said she was no threat. Then why did the facility call the police? I think a large portion of the blame here should be on the facility for allowing the situation to occur, and then calling in police who aren't trained (I assume) in dealing with dementia patients.
Could have easily used one hand to keep her at a safe distance risking only some cuts to his hand.
Or you know, just slowly walk in a circle or whatever.
But no, fun is fun, and having fun at work is a nice perk I guess. /s
Ugh. I'm going to get downvoted ... but I kind of agree with the ruling.
-
We don't know the whole story. A 95 year old dementia patient with a butcher knife hits her head and dies after being tazed... that's the summary. The courts had all the details and likely made the best decision.
-
One dumb unfortunate mistake should not put an officer in prison for 10+ years. This man served his community for years only to make one regretful split second decision ... his years of service have to count for something and balance out the mistake.
Here's what happened. It was a steak knife (not a butcher knife), she was using a walker, and she was 5' 2" tall.
A 95-year-old woman is in critical condition after police in Australia shocked her with a stun gun as she approached them with a walking frame and a steak knife at her nursing home.
At the time, "she was approaching police, but it is fair to say at a slow pace,” he said. “She had a walking frame, but she had a knife.”
After responding to a call about a patient having a knife in her possession, Cotter said Nowland was found in a “small confined” treatment room by two officers who arrived at the scene.
“Negotiations commenced for her to drop the knife. For whatever reasons, Clare did not do that,” he said, adding that the senior constable activated his stun gun, which are widely known as Tasers after a major manufacturer.
The 5-foot-2 woman, who weighs 95 pounds, fell to the ground and struck her head.
Given that the whole point of a device like that is they incapacitate without doing permanent harm, that sounds entirely reasonable at first glance.
Tazers and other less lethal means can still kill, and old people are fragile as hell. If you tazed 100 95 year olds I would bet money on more than half of them dying directly or shortly thereafter.
I definitely wouldn't put money on 50/50.
Also, it was falling that hurt her, not the actual shock.
it was falling that hurt her
Is that not a direct and normal consequence of being tazed?
Often, yes. But the TAZER didn't directly kill her, which is a subtle difference, but worth pointing out.
Yep plus people with dementia can have a lot of strength and speed. It depends on how close they were, furniture in the room, other people there etc.
Australia is as bad as USA and gets even less recognition, love me a neolibs paradise
I heard about an aussie officer serving a few years for shooting a running suspect in the back with a taser.
I'd like to see a source for that, because that definitely sounds like nonsense.
There was this one time that a guy on a wheel chair was gonna run me over. I was totally afraid of getting run over like that. I kept being afraid for a little while, waiting for inevitable death. A few minutes later as the guy approached at velocities I couldn't comprehend, I kept thinking several tomes of a novel I was gonna write about the incident. So I began typing away and he kept approaching, closer and closer, any day now. I went home for the night, but I'll be back tomorrow and the day after unit the day I hue). In the end I had to defend myself, so I beat him up. Lol not true.